Sustainability in Business: Integrated Management of Value Creation and Disvalue Mitigation

Markus Beckmann, S. Schaltegger
{"title":"Sustainability in Business: Integrated Management of Value Creation and Disvalue Mitigation","authors":"Markus Beckmann, S. Schaltegger","doi":"10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sustainable development is about meeting the needs of current and future generations while operating in the safe ecological space of planetary boundaries. Against this background, companies can contribute to sustainability in both positive and negative ways. In a world of scarce resources, the positive contribution of businesses is to create value for diverse stakeholders (i.e., goods in the actual sense of good services and things with value) without social shortfalls or ecological overshooting with regard to planetary boundaries. Yet, when value-creation processes cause negative social or ecological externalities, companies create disvalue for current or future stakeholders, thus undermining sustainable development. Sustainability in business therefore aims at the integrative management of value creation and disvalue mitigation. Various institutions, such as sustainability laws as well as quasi-regulatory and voluntary sustainability standards, aim at providing an enabling environment in this regard yet are often insufficient. Corporate sustainability therefore calls for proactive management. Neither value nor disvalue fall from heaven but are rather co-created or caused through the interaction with stakeholders. Transforming from unsustainability to sustainability thus requires transforming the underlying relational arrangements. Here, market and non-market stakeholder relations need to be distinguished. In markets, companies transact with customers, employees, suppliers, and financiers who typically have voluntary exchange relationships with the firm. As a result, stakeholders can use the exit option when the relationship causes them harm. Companies therefore need to know and respect their value-creation partners, their potential contributions, and above all their needs. Sustainability can influence these market relationships in two ways. First, as sustainability addresses environmental, social, and ethical issues that are otherwise often overlooked, sustainability can relate to specific goals and motivations that stakeholders pursue when they care about these matters. Second, sustainability can be linked to transaction-specific particularities. This can be the case when sustainability features lead to information asymmetries, higher transaction costs, or resource dependencies. Non-market relationships, however, can differ in that stakeholders are involuntarily affected by the firm. In many cases, such as environmental pollution, stakeholders like local communities experience disvalue but cannot simply walk away. From a sustainability perspective, giving voice to non-market stakeholders through dialogue and participation is therefore crucial to identify early-on potential issues where companies cause disvalue. Such a proactive dialogue does not necessarily present a constraint that limits value creation in the market. Giving a voice to non-market stakeholders can also help create innovations and mobilize valuable resources such as knowledge, legitimacy, and partnership. The key idea is to find solutions that create value not only for market stakeholders but also for a larger circle, including non-market stakeholders as well. Such stakeholder business cases for sustainability aim at the synergistic integration of value creation and disvalue mitigation.","PeriodicalId":294617,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Sustainable development is about meeting the needs of current and future generations while operating in the safe ecological space of planetary boundaries. Against this background, companies can contribute to sustainability in both positive and negative ways. In a world of scarce resources, the positive contribution of businesses is to create value for diverse stakeholders (i.e., goods in the actual sense of good services and things with value) without social shortfalls or ecological overshooting with regard to planetary boundaries. Yet, when value-creation processes cause negative social or ecological externalities, companies create disvalue for current or future stakeholders, thus undermining sustainable development. Sustainability in business therefore aims at the integrative management of value creation and disvalue mitigation. Various institutions, such as sustainability laws as well as quasi-regulatory and voluntary sustainability standards, aim at providing an enabling environment in this regard yet are often insufficient. Corporate sustainability therefore calls for proactive management. Neither value nor disvalue fall from heaven but are rather co-created or caused through the interaction with stakeholders. Transforming from unsustainability to sustainability thus requires transforming the underlying relational arrangements. Here, market and non-market stakeholder relations need to be distinguished. In markets, companies transact with customers, employees, suppliers, and financiers who typically have voluntary exchange relationships with the firm. As a result, stakeholders can use the exit option when the relationship causes them harm. Companies therefore need to know and respect their value-creation partners, their potential contributions, and above all their needs. Sustainability can influence these market relationships in two ways. First, as sustainability addresses environmental, social, and ethical issues that are otherwise often overlooked, sustainability can relate to specific goals and motivations that stakeholders pursue when they care about these matters. Second, sustainability can be linked to transaction-specific particularities. This can be the case when sustainability features lead to information asymmetries, higher transaction costs, or resource dependencies. Non-market relationships, however, can differ in that stakeholders are involuntarily affected by the firm. In many cases, such as environmental pollution, stakeholders like local communities experience disvalue but cannot simply walk away. From a sustainability perspective, giving voice to non-market stakeholders through dialogue and participation is therefore crucial to identify early-on potential issues where companies cause disvalue. Such a proactive dialogue does not necessarily present a constraint that limits value creation in the market. Giving a voice to non-market stakeholders can also help create innovations and mobilize valuable resources such as knowledge, legitimacy, and partnership. The key idea is to find solutions that create value not only for market stakeholders but also for a larger circle, including non-market stakeholders as well. Such stakeholder business cases for sustainability aim at the synergistic integration of value creation and disvalue mitigation.
商业中的可持续性:价值创造与价值减少的综合管理
可持续发展是指在地球边界的安全生态空间内运作,同时满足今世后代的需要。在这种背景下,公司可以以积极和消极的方式为可持续发展做出贡献。在一个资源稀缺的世界里,企业的积极贡献是为不同的利益相关者(即实际意义上的良好服务和有价值的东西)创造价值,而不会出现社会短缺或地球边界的生态超载。然而,当价值创造过程导致负面的社会或生态外部性时,公司就会为当前或未来的利益相关者创造负面价值,从而破坏可持续发展。因此,企业的可持续性旨在综合管理价值创造和减少不价值。各种机构,例如可持续性法律以及准管制和自愿的可持续性标准,旨在提供这方面的有利环境,但往往是不够的。因此,企业的可持续发展需要积极主动的管理。价值和不价值都不是从天上掉下来的,而是通过与利益相关者的互动共同创造或产生的。因此,从不可持续到可持续的转变需要改变基本的关系安排。在这里,需要区分市场和非市场的利益相关者关系。在市场中,公司与客户、雇员、供应商和通常与公司有自愿交换关系的金融家进行交易。因此,当这种关系对利益相关者造成伤害时,他们可以选择退出。因此,公司需要了解并尊重其创造价值的合作伙伴、他们的潜在贡献,尤其是他们的需求。可持续性可以通过两种方式影响这些市场关系。首先,由于可持续发展解决了环境、社会和道德问题,否则往往被忽视,可持续发展可以与利益相关者在关心这些问题时追求的具体目标和动机有关。其次,可持续性可以与特定于交易的特殊性联系起来。当可持续性特征导致信息不对称、更高的交易成本或资源依赖时,就会出现这种情况。然而,非市场关系可能有所不同,因为利益相关者会不由自主地受到企业的影响。在许多情况下,比如环境污染,像当地社区这样的利益相关者经历了贬值,但不能简单地走开。因此,从可持续发展的角度来看,通过对话和参与让非市场利益相关者发声,对于及早发现公司造成不价值的潜在问题至关重要。这种积极主动的对话并不一定构成限制市场价值创造的约束。给予非市场利益相关者发言权也有助于创造创新和调动知识、合法性和伙伴关系等宝贵资源。关键的想法是找到解决方案,不仅为市场利益相关者创造价值,也为更大的圈子创造价值,包括非市场利益相关者。这些利益攸关方的可持续性业务案例旨在将创造价值和减少不价值协同结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信