Identifiability of Cause and Effect using Regularized Regression

Alexander Marx, Jilles Vreeken
{"title":"Identifiability of Cause and Effect using Regularized Regression","authors":"Alexander Marx, Jilles Vreeken","doi":"10.1145/3292500.3330854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider the problem of telling apart cause from effect between two univariate continuous-valued random variables X and Y. In general, it is impossible to make definite statements about causality without making assumptions on the underlying model; one of the most important aspects of causal inference is hence to determine under which assumptions are we able to do so. In this paper we show under which general conditions we can identify cause from effect by simply choosing the direction with the best regression score. We define a general framework of identifiable regression-based scoring functions, and show how to instantiate it in practice using regression splines. Compared to existing methods that either give strong guarantees, but are hardly applicable in practice, or provide no guarantees, but do work well in practice, our instantiation combines the best of both worlds; it gives guarantees, while empirical evaluation on synthetic and real-world data shows that it performs at least as well as the state of the art.","PeriodicalId":186134,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3292500.3330854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

We consider the problem of telling apart cause from effect between two univariate continuous-valued random variables X and Y. In general, it is impossible to make definite statements about causality without making assumptions on the underlying model; one of the most important aspects of causal inference is hence to determine under which assumptions are we able to do so. In this paper we show under which general conditions we can identify cause from effect by simply choosing the direction with the best regression score. We define a general framework of identifiable regression-based scoring functions, and show how to instantiate it in practice using regression splines. Compared to existing methods that either give strong guarantees, but are hardly applicable in practice, or provide no guarantees, but do work well in practice, our instantiation combines the best of both worlds; it gives guarantees, while empirical evaluation on synthetic and real-world data shows that it performs at least as well as the state of the art.
用正则化回归分析因果关系的可辨识性
我们考虑在两个单变量连续值随机变量X和y之间区分因果关系的问题。一般来说,如果不对基础模型做出假设,就不可能对因果关系做出明确的陈述;因此,因果推理的一个最重要的方面是确定在哪些假设下我们能够这样做。在本文中,我们证明了在一般条件下,我们可以通过简单地选择具有最佳回归分数的方向来识别因果关系。我们定义了一个可识别的基于回归的评分函数的一般框架,并展示了如何在实践中使用回归样条实例化它。与现有的方法相比,要么提供强大的保证,但在实践中很难适用,要么不提供保证,但在实践中工作得很好,我们的实例结合了这两个世界的最好的;它提供了保证,而对合成数据和真实世界数据的经验评估表明,它的性能至少与最先进的技术一样好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信