Combining Probabilistic Estimates to Reduce Uncertainty

Stephen A. Book
{"title":"Combining Probabilistic Estimates to Reduce Uncertainty","authors":"Stephen A. Book","doi":"10.1080/1941658X.2009.10462224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Suppose we have contracted for or otherwise obtained n probabilistic estimates, expressed as random variables, independent of each other, of the same system or project. This assumption means that we have, for each estimate, a random variable having a probability distribution (likely something close to the lognormal), an S-curve, a mean, and a standard deviation. We want to combine these n estimates to obtain one estimate that contains less uncertainty than each of the n estimates individually. There are two questions that we have to answer: 1) How should we “combine” the estimates? and 2) Will the combined estimate actually be less uncertain than each of the n independent estimates individually? For this issue to be meaningful, we must assume that each of the estimates is “correct,” i.e., 1) they are neither too optimistic, nor too pessimistic, but are based on risk assessments validly drawn from the same risk information available to each estimating team; 2) each estimating team has applied appropriate mathematical techniques to the cost-risk analysis, including, for example, inter-element correlations when appropriate; and 3) each estimating team was working from the same ground rules but may have applied different estimating methods and made different assumptions when encountering the absence of some information required by their estimating method.","PeriodicalId":390877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cost Analysis and Parametrics","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cost Analysis and Parametrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1941658X.2009.10462224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Suppose we have contracted for or otherwise obtained n probabilistic estimates, expressed as random variables, independent of each other, of the same system or project. This assumption means that we have, for each estimate, a random variable having a probability distribution (likely something close to the lognormal), an S-curve, a mean, and a standard deviation. We want to combine these n estimates to obtain one estimate that contains less uncertainty than each of the n estimates individually. There are two questions that we have to answer: 1) How should we “combine” the estimates? and 2) Will the combined estimate actually be less uncertain than each of the n independent estimates individually? For this issue to be meaningful, we must assume that each of the estimates is “correct,” i.e., 1) they are neither too optimistic, nor too pessimistic, but are based on risk assessments validly drawn from the same risk information available to each estimating team; 2) each estimating team has applied appropriate mathematical techniques to the cost-risk analysis, including, for example, inter-element correlations when appropriate; and 3) each estimating team was working from the same ground rules but may have applied different estimating methods and made different assumptions when encountering the absence of some information required by their estimating method.
结合概率估计减少不确定性
摘要:假设我们已经对同一系统或项目的n个概率估计进行了收缩或以其他方式获得了n个概率估计,它们表示为相互独立的随机变量。这个假设意味着,对于每个估计,我们有一个随机变量具有概率分布(可能接近对数正态),s曲线,平均值和标准差。我们想把这n个估计值结合起来得到一个估计值它包含的不确定性比n个估计值中的每一个都要小。我们必须回答两个问题:1)我们应该如何“合并”这些估计?2)组合估计值的不确定性是否比n个独立估计值中的每一个都小?为了使这个问题有意义,我们必须假设每个评估都是“正确的”,即,1)它们既不是太乐观,也不是太悲观,而是基于从每个评估团队可用的相同风险信息中有效提取的风险评估;2)每个估算团队已将适当的数学技术应用于成本风险分析,包括,例如,适当时,元素间的相关性;3)每个评估团队都基于相同的基本规则进行工作,但在遇到评估方法所需的某些信息缺失时,可能应用了不同的评估方法并做出了不同的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信