{"title":"On the Limitations of PSO in Cooperation with FPI-based Adaptive Control for Nonlinear Systems","authors":"H. Issa, J. Tar","doi":"10.1109/INES56734.2022.9922654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Essentially two kinds of adaptive controllers exist. To first-class belong those that commence their work with an available analytically known approximate system model and try to refine its parameters by using real-time observations. The elements of the second class do not wish to amend this initial model: rather they apply casual, not permanently maintained model corrections that rather depend on the observed situations that occur during the actual motion of the controlled system. Theoretically, it can be expected that an analytical model in the background can be refined, and placed in use even in this latter case. By the use of the van der Pol oscillator as a benchmark example of nonlinear systems and the Particle Swarm Optimization method for model correction, it is realized that our idea is too optimistic and the correction of the analytical model by learning may have limitations. This statement is substantiated via simulation examples.","PeriodicalId":253486,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 26th International Conference on Intelligent Engineering Systems (INES)","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 26th International Conference on Intelligent Engineering Systems (INES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INES56734.2022.9922654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Essentially two kinds of adaptive controllers exist. To first-class belong those that commence their work with an available analytically known approximate system model and try to refine its parameters by using real-time observations. The elements of the second class do not wish to amend this initial model: rather they apply casual, not permanently maintained model corrections that rather depend on the observed situations that occur during the actual motion of the controlled system. Theoretically, it can be expected that an analytical model in the background can be refined, and placed in use even in this latter case. By the use of the van der Pol oscillator as a benchmark example of nonlinear systems and the Particle Swarm Optimization method for model correction, it is realized that our idea is too optimistic and the correction of the analytical model by learning may have limitations. This statement is substantiated via simulation examples.
本质上存在两种自适应控制器。第一类属于那些从一个可用的解析已知的近似系统模型开始他们的工作,并试图通过使用实时观测来改进其参数的人。第二类元素不希望修正这个初始模型:相反,它们应用偶然的,而不是永久维持的模型修正,而是依赖于在被控系统的实际运动期间发生的观察情况。从理论上讲,可以预期后台的分析模型可以被细化,甚至在后一种情况下也可以被使用。通过以van der Pol振子作为非线性系统的基准例子和粒子群优化方法进行模型校正,认识到我们的想法过于乐观,通过学习对解析模型进行校正可能存在局限性。通过仿真实例证实了这一说法。