The impact of drug order complexity on prospective medication order review and verification time

David S Dakwa, V. Marshall, B. Chaffee
{"title":"The impact of drug order complexity on prospective medication order review and verification time","authors":"David S Dakwa, V. Marshall, B. Chaffee","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocz188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo assess if the amount of time a pharmacist spends verifying medication orders increases as medication orders become more complex.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nThe study was conducted by observing pharmacist verification of adult medication orders in an academic medical center. Drug order complexity was prospectively defined and validated using a classification system derived from 3 factors: the degree of order variability, ISMP high-alert classification, and a pharmacist perception survey. Screen capture software was used to measure pharmacist order review time for each classification. The annualized volume of low complexity drug orders was used to calculate the potential time savings if these were verified using an alternate system that did not require pharmacist review.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe primary study hypothesis was not achieved. Regression results did not show statistical significance for moderate (n = 30, 23.7 seconds, sd = 23.3) or high complexity (n = 30, 18.6 seconds, sd = 23.1) drugs relative to the low complexity drugs (n = 30, 8.0 seconds, sd = 14.4) nor for moderate vs high complexity; (βmoderate vs low = 15.6, P = .113), (βhigh vs low = 10.3, P = .235), (βmoderate vs high = 5.3, P = .737). The sensitivity analysis showed statistical significance in the high vs low comparison (βhigh vs low = 13.8, P = .017).\n\n\nDISCUSSION\nThis study showed that verifying pharmacists spent less time than projected to verify medication orders of different complexities, but the time did not correlate with the classifications used in our complexity scale. Several mitigating factors, including operational aspects associated with timing antimicrobial orders, likely influenced order verification time. These factors should be evaluated in future studies which seek to define drug order complexity and optimize pharmacist time spent in medication order verification.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe findings suggest that there may be other factors involved in pharmacist decision-making that should be considered when categorizing drugs by perceived complexity.","PeriodicalId":236137,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To assess if the amount of time a pharmacist spends verifying medication orders increases as medication orders become more complex. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study was conducted by observing pharmacist verification of adult medication orders in an academic medical center. Drug order complexity was prospectively defined and validated using a classification system derived from 3 factors: the degree of order variability, ISMP high-alert classification, and a pharmacist perception survey. Screen capture software was used to measure pharmacist order review time for each classification. The annualized volume of low complexity drug orders was used to calculate the potential time savings if these were verified using an alternate system that did not require pharmacist review. RESULTS The primary study hypothesis was not achieved. Regression results did not show statistical significance for moderate (n = 30, 23.7 seconds, sd = 23.3) or high complexity (n = 30, 18.6 seconds, sd = 23.1) drugs relative to the low complexity drugs (n = 30, 8.0 seconds, sd = 14.4) nor for moderate vs high complexity; (βmoderate vs low = 15.6, P = .113), (βhigh vs low = 10.3, P = .235), (βmoderate vs high = 5.3, P = .737). The sensitivity analysis showed statistical significance in the high vs low comparison (βhigh vs low = 13.8, P = .017). DISCUSSION This study showed that verifying pharmacists spent less time than projected to verify medication orders of different complexities, but the time did not correlate with the classifications used in our complexity scale. Several mitigating factors, including operational aspects associated with timing antimicrobial orders, likely influenced order verification time. These factors should be evaluated in future studies which seek to define drug order complexity and optimize pharmacist time spent in medication order verification. CONCLUSION The findings suggest that there may be other factors involved in pharmacist decision-making that should be considered when categorizing drugs by perceived complexity.
医嘱复杂性对前瞻性医嘱审核和验证时间的影响
目的评估药师验证医嘱的时间是否随着医嘱的复杂化而增加。材料与方法本研究采用某学术医疗中心药师对成人用药单进行验证的方法。使用一个分类系统前瞻性地定义和验证药品订单复杂性,该分类系统来源于3个因素:订单变异性程度、ISMP高警戒分类和药剂师感知调查。使用屏幕捕获软件测量每个分类的药剂师订单审查时间。如果使用不需要药剂师审查的替代系统进行验证,则使用低复杂性药物订单的年化量来计算潜在的时间节省。结果初步研究假设不成立。相对于低复杂性药物(n = 30, 8.0秒,sd = 14.4),中度(n = 30, 23.7秒,sd = 23.3)、高复杂性药物(n = 30, 18.6秒,sd = 23.1)和中度与高复杂性药物的回归结果均无统计学意义;(β温和、低= 15.6,P = .113),(β高与低= 10.3,P = .235),(β温和vs高= 5.3,P = .737)。高、低比较敏感性分析有统计学意义(β高、低= 13.8,P = 0.017)。本研究表明,验证药师在验证不同复杂性的医嘱上花费的时间比预计的要少,但时间与我们复杂性量表中使用的分类无关。几个缓解因素,包括与抗菌药物订单计时相关的操作方面,可能会影响订单验证时间。这些因素应该在未来的研究中进行评估,以确定药品订单复杂性并优化药剂师在药品订单验证中花费的时间。结论药师根据感知复杂性对药品进行分类时,可能需要考虑其他因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信