Creatività vs Patrimonio Culturale? The Winner Takes it All (Creativity vs Cultural Heritage? The Winner Takes It All)

Mara Cerquetti
{"title":"Creatività vs Patrimonio Culturale? The Winner Takes it All (Creativity vs Cultural Heritage? The Winner Takes It All)","authors":"Mara Cerquetti","doi":"10.7433/s105.2018.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose of the paper: The paper analyses the origins, features and effects of the shift towards creativity in cultural policy over the last twenty years, aiming atunderstanding its impact on cultural heritage and museum management. \nMethodology: The research verifies the findings of the literature review on this matter analysing the case of the UK as the European country where the creativitybased approach was born. After going over the scientific debate on cultural and creative industries (CCI), the beginning of creative economy and its development are pointed out. The research is based on the deep examination of scientific articles, policy documents and reports and strengthened by some in-depth interviews to a sample of museum managers in London. \nResults: The research results reveal that the shift towards creativity has marginalised cultural heritage in cultural policy in favour of CCI stricto sensu,determining the predominance of models that do not consider the specificity and value of local resources. Goals of social inclusion, democratization of culture and cross-fertilization between different cultural sectors too have not been fully achieved. \nResearch limitation: This paper has the limitations of the qualitative research. A further development could encompass the widening of the field of investigation and the analysis of the results of European cultural programmes. \nPractical implications: The paper provides advice to policy makers and public and private cultural managers, suggesting the opportunity of a deeper exploration of alternative models based on the enhancement of place-specific resources and aimed at promoting sustainable development in the glocal context.Originality of the paper: In the context of an increasing enthusiasm towards creative-driven approaches the research highlights some limits of the prevailing models.","PeriodicalId":142620,"journal":{"name":"Arts Administration & Museum Studies eJournal","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts Administration & Museum Studies eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7433/s105.2018.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of the paper: The paper analyses the origins, features and effects of the shift towards creativity in cultural policy over the last twenty years, aiming atunderstanding its impact on cultural heritage and museum management. Methodology: The research verifies the findings of the literature review on this matter analysing the case of the UK as the European country where the creativitybased approach was born. After going over the scientific debate on cultural and creative industries (CCI), the beginning of creative economy and its development are pointed out. The research is based on the deep examination of scientific articles, policy documents and reports and strengthened by some in-depth interviews to a sample of museum managers in London. Results: The research results reveal that the shift towards creativity has marginalised cultural heritage in cultural policy in favour of CCI stricto sensu,determining the predominance of models that do not consider the specificity and value of local resources. Goals of social inclusion, democratization of culture and cross-fertilization between different cultural sectors too have not been fully achieved. Research limitation: This paper has the limitations of the qualitative research. A further development could encompass the widening of the field of investigation and the analysis of the results of European cultural programmes. Practical implications: The paper provides advice to policy makers and public and private cultural managers, suggesting the opportunity of a deeper exploration of alternative models based on the enhancement of place-specific resources and aimed at promoting sustainable development in the glocal context.Originality of the paper: In the context of an increasing enthusiasm towards creative-driven approaches the research highlights some limits of the prevailing models.
创意vs文化传承?赢家通吃(创意vs文化遗产?)胜者通吃)
本文的目的:本文分析了过去二十年来文化政策向创意转变的起源、特征和影响,旨在了解其对文化遗产和博物馆管理的影响。方法:该研究验证了文献综述的结果,分析了英国作为欧洲国家的案例,创造性为基础的方法诞生了。在回顾文化创意产业的科学争论之后,指出了创意经济的起源及其发展。这项研究基于对科学文章、政策文件和报告的深入研究,并通过对伦敦博物馆经理样本的一些深度访谈得到了加强。结果:研究结果表明,向创造力的转变使文化遗产在文化政策中边缘化,有利于严格意义上的CCI,决定了不考虑当地资源的特殊性和价值的模型的优势。社会包容、文化民主化和不同文化部门之间的交流也没有完全实现。研究的局限性:本文存在定性研究的局限性。进一步的发展可能包括扩大调查领域和分析欧洲文化方案的结果。实践意义:本文为政策制定者和公共和私人文化管理者提供了建议,提出了在增强地方特定资源的基础上更深入探索替代模式的机会,旨在促进全球地方背景下的可持续发展。论文的原创性:在对创新驱动方法的热情日益高涨的背景下,研究突出了主流模型的一些局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信