Performance Evaluation of Four Grid-Forming Control Techniques with Soft Black-Start Capabilities

Abdulrahman Alassi, K. Ahmed, A. Egea-Àlvarez, O. Ellabban
{"title":"Performance Evaluation of Four Grid-Forming Control Techniques with Soft Black-Start Capabilities","authors":"Abdulrahman Alassi, K. Ahmed, A. Egea-Àlvarez, O. Ellabban","doi":"10.1109/ICRERA49962.2020.9242758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Grid-Forming Converters (GFC) can be controlled as independent, self-starting, voltage sources. This feature is essential for power converters to achieve successful black-start sequence initiation. Conventional grid-following converters are not capable of self-starting an islanded network. GFC control thus exploits wider grid support and network restart potential. This study analyzes and compares four GFC controllers to assess their generic and soft black-start (ramping voltage) capabilities. The compared techniques are: Droop Control, Power Synchronizing Control (PSC), Virtual Synchronous Machine (VSM), and Matching control. These techniques are selected based on their direct voltage reference control flexibility. Various simulations are performed with common parameters to assess the response of each technique under similar conditions against load, DC voltage and active power reference disturbances, in addition to their soft-start readiness. The results demonstrate the high-level compatibility of these four controllers with soft black-start through successful and timely ramping voltage reference tracking. Moreover, the four considered control techniques achieve satisfactory performance, with VSM demonstrating more flexibility due to its tunable virtual inertia parameter (J).","PeriodicalId":129367,"journal":{"name":"2020 9th International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Application (ICRERA)","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 9th International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Application (ICRERA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRERA49962.2020.9242758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Grid-Forming Converters (GFC) can be controlled as independent, self-starting, voltage sources. This feature is essential for power converters to achieve successful black-start sequence initiation. Conventional grid-following converters are not capable of self-starting an islanded network. GFC control thus exploits wider grid support and network restart potential. This study analyzes and compares four GFC controllers to assess their generic and soft black-start (ramping voltage) capabilities. The compared techniques are: Droop Control, Power Synchronizing Control (PSC), Virtual Synchronous Machine (VSM), and Matching control. These techniques are selected based on their direct voltage reference control flexibility. Various simulations are performed with common parameters to assess the response of each technique under similar conditions against load, DC voltage and active power reference disturbances, in addition to their soft-start readiness. The results demonstrate the high-level compatibility of these four controllers with soft black-start through successful and timely ramping voltage reference tracking. Moreover, the four considered control techniques achieve satisfactory performance, with VSM demonstrating more flexibility due to its tunable virtual inertia parameter (J).
四种具有软黑启动能力的成形网格控制技术的性能评价
并网变换器(GFC)可以作为独立的、自启动的电压源进行控制。该特性对于电源变换器实现成功的黑启动序列启动至关重要。传统的电网跟随变流器不能自启动孤岛网络。因此,GFC控制利用了更广泛的电网支持和网络重启的潜力。本研究分析和比较了四种GFC控制器,以评估它们的通用和软黑启动(斜坡电压)能力。比较的技术有:下垂控制、功率同步控制(PSC)、虚拟同步机(VSM)和匹配控制。这些技术的选择是基于它们的直接电压参考控制的灵活性。使用通用参数进行各种模拟,以评估每种技术在相似条件下对负载、直流电压和有功参考干扰的响应,以及它们的软启动准备情况。结果表明,通过成功和及时的斜坡电压基准跟踪,这四种控制器具有高水平的软黑启动兼容性。此外,所考虑的四种控制技术都取得了令人满意的性能,其中VSM由于其虚拟惯性参数(J)可调而表现出更大的灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信