The impact of delayed transfers of care on emergency departments: common sense arguments, evidence and confounding

Brad Keogh, T. Monks
{"title":"The impact of delayed transfers of care on emergency departments: common sense arguments, evidence and confounding","authors":"Brad Keogh, T. Monks","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2018-207917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives There have been claims that Delayed Transfers of Care (DTOCs) of inpatients to home or a less acute setting are related to Emergency Department (ED) crowding. In particular DTOCs were associated with breaches of the UK 4-hour waiting time target in a previously published analysis. However, the analysis has major limitations by not adjusting for the longitudinal trend of the data. The aim of this work is to investigate whether the proposition that DTOCs impact the 4-hour target requires further research. Method Estimation of an association between two or more variables that are measured over time requires specialised statistical methods. In this study, we performed two separate analyses. First, we created two sets of artificial data with no correlation. We then added an upward trend over time and again assessed for correlation. Second, we reproduced the simple linear regression of the original study using NHS England open data of English trusts between 2010 and 2016, assessing correlation of numbers of DTOCs and ED breaches of the 4-hour target. We then reanalysed the same data using standard time series methods to remove the trend before estimating an association. Results After introducing upward trends into the uncorrelated artificial data the correlation between the two data sets increased (R2=0.00 to 0.51 respectively). We found strong evidence of longitudinal trends within the NHS data of ED breaches and DTOCs. After removal of the trends the R2 reduced from 0.50 to 0.01. Conclusion Our reanalysis found weak correlation between numbers of DTOCs and ED 4-hour target breaches. Our study does not indicate that there is no relationship between 4-hour target and DTOCs, it highlights that statistically robust evidence for this relationship does not currently exist. Further work is required to understand the relationship between breaches of the 4-hour target and numbers of DTOCs.","PeriodicalId":410922,"journal":{"name":"Emergency medicine journal : EMJ","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency medicine journal : EMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2018-207917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives There have been claims that Delayed Transfers of Care (DTOCs) of inpatients to home or a less acute setting are related to Emergency Department (ED) crowding. In particular DTOCs were associated with breaches of the UK 4-hour waiting time target in a previously published analysis. However, the analysis has major limitations by not adjusting for the longitudinal trend of the data. The aim of this work is to investigate whether the proposition that DTOCs impact the 4-hour target requires further research. Method Estimation of an association between two or more variables that are measured over time requires specialised statistical methods. In this study, we performed two separate analyses. First, we created two sets of artificial data with no correlation. We then added an upward trend over time and again assessed for correlation. Second, we reproduced the simple linear regression of the original study using NHS England open data of English trusts between 2010 and 2016, assessing correlation of numbers of DTOCs and ED breaches of the 4-hour target. We then reanalysed the same data using standard time series methods to remove the trend before estimating an association. Results After introducing upward trends into the uncorrelated artificial data the correlation between the two data sets increased (R2=0.00 to 0.51 respectively). We found strong evidence of longitudinal trends within the NHS data of ED breaches and DTOCs. After removal of the trends the R2 reduced from 0.50 to 0.01. Conclusion Our reanalysis found weak correlation between numbers of DTOCs and ED 4-hour target breaches. Our study does not indicate that there is no relationship between 4-hour target and DTOCs, it highlights that statistically robust evidence for this relationship does not currently exist. Further work is required to understand the relationship between breaches of the 4-hour target and numbers of DTOCs.
急诊部门延迟转移护理的影响:常识性论点,证据和混淆
有声称延迟转移护理(dtoc)住院病人到家里或较不急性设置与急诊科(ED)拥挤。特别是在之前公布的分析中,DTOCs与英国4小时等待时间目标的违反有关。然而,由于没有对数据的纵向趋势进行调整,这种分析有很大的局限性。这项工作的目的是调查DTOCs影响4小时目标的命题是否需要进一步研究。方法对两个或多个随时间测量的变量之间的关联进行估计需要专门的统计方法。在这项研究中,我们进行了两个独立的分析。首先,我们创建了两组没有相关性的人工数据。然后我们添加了一个上升趋势,并再次评估相关性。其次,我们使用2010年至2016年英国NHS英格兰信托的公开数据再现了原始研究的简单线性回归,评估了DTOCs数量与ED违反4小时目标的相关性。然后,我们使用标准时间序列方法重新分析相同的数据,在估计关联之前去除趋势。结果在不相关的人工数据中引入上升趋势后,两组数据的相关性增加(R2=0.00 ~ 0.51)。我们在NHS数据中发现了ED违规和DTOCs的纵向趋势的有力证据。去除趋势后,R2从0.50降至0.01。结论我们的再分析发现DTOCs数量与ED 4小时靶裂的相关性较弱。我们的研究并没有表明4小时目标和DTOCs之间没有关系,它强调了这种关系的统计上的有力证据目前还不存在。需要进一步的工作来了解违反4小时目标与dtoc数量之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信