Data Quality Issues and Content Analysis for Research Data Repositories : The Case of Dryad

Dimitris Rousidis, M. Sicilia, E. Garoufallou, P. Balatsoukas
{"title":"Data Quality Issues and Content Analysis for Research Data Repositories : The Case of Dryad","authors":"Dimitris Rousidis, M. Sicilia, E. Garoufallou, P. Balatsoukas","doi":"10.3233/978-1-61499-409-1-49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research Object (RO) repositories extend traditional forms of scholarly communication by providing scientists the means necessary to store, share and re-use datasets generated at various stages of the research process. Yet this shift to digital publication does not guarantee that outputs, results or methods are reusable.  Data quality is absolutely vital for the dissemination, reuse and sharing of digital resources. Manual metadata quality control is practically impossible and as a result, many quality criteria, both semantically and structurally get overlooked and digital objects may become problematic. The aim of the research reported on this paper was to identify the data quality problems associated with the Dryad research data repository. In particular, three metadata elements (Creator, Date and Resource Type) were analysed and quality issues associated to these elements were identified. The paper concludes with some recommendations for improving the quality of metadata in research data repositories.","PeriodicalId":130180,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Electronic Publishing","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Electronic Publishing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-409-1-49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Research Object (RO) repositories extend traditional forms of scholarly communication by providing scientists the means necessary to store, share and re-use datasets generated at various stages of the research process. Yet this shift to digital publication does not guarantee that outputs, results or methods are reusable.  Data quality is absolutely vital for the dissemination, reuse and sharing of digital resources. Manual metadata quality control is practically impossible and as a result, many quality criteria, both semantically and structurally get overlooked and digital objects may become problematic. The aim of the research reported on this paper was to identify the data quality problems associated with the Dryad research data repository. In particular, three metadata elements (Creator, Date and Resource Type) were analysed and quality issues associated to these elements were identified. The paper concludes with some recommendations for improving the quality of metadata in research data repositories.
研究数据存储库的数据质量问题和内容分析:以Dryad为例
研究对象(RO)存储库通过为科学家提供存储、共享和重用在研究过程的各个阶段生成的数据集的必要手段,扩展了传统的学术交流形式。然而,这种向数字出版的转变并不能保证产出、结果或方法是可重复使用的。数据质量对数字资源的传播、再利用和共享至关重要。手工的元数据质量控制实际上是不可能的,因此,许多质量标准(包括语义和结构)被忽略,数字对象可能会出现问题。本文报告的研究目的是确定与Dryad研究数据存储库相关的数据质量问题。特别地,分析了三个元数据元素(Creator、Date和Resource Type),并确定了与这些元素相关的质量问题。最后,提出了提高科研数据库元数据质量的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信