Comparison of magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) reconstruction algorithms

B. M. Eyüboğlu, V. Arpinar, R. Boyacioglu, E. Değirmenci, G. Eker
{"title":"Comparison of magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) reconstruction algorithms","authors":"B. M. Eyüboğlu, V. Arpinar, R. Boyacioglu, E. Değirmenci, G. Eker","doi":"10.1109/ISBI.2010.5490080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several algorithms have been proposed for image reconstruction in MREIT. These algorithms reconstruct conductivity distribution either directly from magnetic flux density measurements or from reconstructed current density distribution. In this study, performance of all major algorithms are evaluated and compared on a common platform, in terms of their reconstruction error, reconstruction time, perceptual image quality, immunity against measurement noise, required electrode size. J-Substitution (JS) and Hybrid J-Substitution algorithms have the best reconstruction accuracy but they are among the slowest. Another current density based algorithm, Equipotential Projection (EPP) algorithm along with magnetic flux density based Bz Sensitivity (BzS) algorithm has moderate reconstruction accuracy. BzS algorithm is the fastest.","PeriodicalId":250523,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI.2010.5490080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Several algorithms have been proposed for image reconstruction in MREIT. These algorithms reconstruct conductivity distribution either directly from magnetic flux density measurements or from reconstructed current density distribution. In this study, performance of all major algorithms are evaluated and compared on a common platform, in terms of their reconstruction error, reconstruction time, perceptual image quality, immunity against measurement noise, required electrode size. J-Substitution (JS) and Hybrid J-Substitution algorithms have the best reconstruction accuracy but they are among the slowest. Another current density based algorithm, Equipotential Projection (EPP) algorithm along with magnetic flux density based Bz Sensitivity (BzS) algorithm has moderate reconstruction accuracy. BzS algorithm is the fastest.
磁共振电阻抗断层成像(MREIT)重建算法的比较
针对MREIT中的图像重建,已经提出了几种算法。这些算法可以直接从磁通密度测量或从重建的电流密度分布重建电导率分布。在本研究中,所有主要算法的性能在一个共同的平台上进行了评估和比较,包括重建误差、重建时间、感知图像质量、对测量噪声的抗扰度、所需的电极尺寸。J-Substitution (JS)和Hybrid J-Substitution算法具有最好的重建精度,但它们是最慢的。另一种基于电流密度的算法,等电位投影(EPP)算法和基于磁通密度的Bz灵敏度(BzS)算法具有中等的重建精度。BzS算法是最快的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信