B. M. Eyüboğlu, V. Arpinar, R. Boyacioglu, E. Değirmenci, G. Eker
{"title":"Comparison of magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) reconstruction algorithms","authors":"B. M. Eyüboğlu, V. Arpinar, R. Boyacioglu, E. Değirmenci, G. Eker","doi":"10.1109/ISBI.2010.5490080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several algorithms have been proposed for image reconstruction in MREIT. These algorithms reconstruct conductivity distribution either directly from magnetic flux density measurements or from reconstructed current density distribution. In this study, performance of all major algorithms are evaluated and compared on a common platform, in terms of their reconstruction error, reconstruction time, perceptual image quality, immunity against measurement noise, required electrode size. J-Substitution (JS) and Hybrid J-Substitution algorithms have the best reconstruction accuracy but they are among the slowest. Another current density based algorithm, Equipotential Projection (EPP) algorithm along with magnetic flux density based Bz Sensitivity (BzS) algorithm has moderate reconstruction accuracy. BzS algorithm is the fastest.","PeriodicalId":250523,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI.2010.5490080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Several algorithms have been proposed for image reconstruction in MREIT. These algorithms reconstruct conductivity distribution either directly from magnetic flux density measurements or from reconstructed current density distribution. In this study, performance of all major algorithms are evaluated and compared on a common platform, in terms of their reconstruction error, reconstruction time, perceptual image quality, immunity against measurement noise, required electrode size. J-Substitution (JS) and Hybrid J-Substitution algorithms have the best reconstruction accuracy but they are among the slowest. Another current density based algorithm, Equipotential Projection (EPP) algorithm along with magnetic flux density based Bz Sensitivity (BzS) algorithm has moderate reconstruction accuracy. BzS algorithm is the fastest.