On ways to improve the production regulations of criminal cases of private and private-public prosecution

I. V. Ovsyannikov
{"title":"On ways to improve the production regulations of criminal cases of private and private-public prosecution","authors":"I. V. Ovsyannikov","doi":"10.20310/2587-9340-2022-6-2-228-234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the article is, based on an analysis of the differences in the procedures for initiating criminal cases of private and private-public prosecution and proceedings on them, to show the existing contradictions in the legislative regulation of the proceedings, to outline ways to eliminate them. The study made it possible to state the existence of problems in the public procedure for initiating a case – the dependence of the victim-applicant on the will of law enforcement officials and the possibility of difficult-to-surmount obstacles for him in access to justice. The difference in the procedures for terminating criminal cases of the two categories under consideration in connection with the reconciliation of the parties and the shortcomings of the regulation of these procedures in the criminal procedure law are discussed. The draft law of the Supreme Court of the Russian Fed-eration on the transfer of private prosecution cases to the category of private-public prosecution cases is being studied. The advantages and disadvantages of this draft law, proposals for its improvement are formulated. Proposals have been developed to improve the criminal procedure law in terms of regulating the proceedings in criminal cases of private and private-public prosecution.","PeriodicalId":183203,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues of the State and Law","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues of the State and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-9340-2022-6-2-228-234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the article is, based on an analysis of the differences in the procedures for initiating criminal cases of private and private-public prosecution and proceedings on them, to show the existing contradictions in the legislative regulation of the proceedings, to outline ways to eliminate them. The study made it possible to state the existence of problems in the public procedure for initiating a case – the dependence of the victim-applicant on the will of law enforcement officials and the possibility of difficult-to-surmount obstacles for him in access to justice. The difference in the procedures for terminating criminal cases of the two categories under consideration in connection with the reconciliation of the parties and the shortcomings of the regulation of these procedures in the criminal procedure law are discussed. The draft law of the Supreme Court of the Russian Fed-eration on the transfer of private prosecution cases to the category of private-public prosecution cases is being studied. The advantages and disadvantages of this draft law, proposals for its improvement are formulated. Proposals have been developed to improve the criminal procedure law in terms of regulating the proceedings in criminal cases of private and private-public prosecution.
论完善自诉和自诉公诉刑事案件生成规则的途径
本文的目的是通过对私诉与公私公诉刑事立案程序及其诉讼程序差异的分析,揭示我国私诉与公私公诉刑事立案程序立法规制中存在的矛盾,并提出消除这些矛盾的途径。通过这项研究,可以说明在提起案件的公共程序中存在的问题- -受害人-申请人对执法官员意愿的依赖,以及他在诉诸司法方面可能存在难以克服的障碍。讨论了两类刑事案件的终止程序在当事人和解方面的差异以及刑事诉讼法对这类程序的规定的不足。目前正在研究俄罗斯联邦最高法院关于将私人起诉案件转为公私起诉案件类别的法律草案。分析了本法草案的优缺点,并提出了完善建议。在规范私诉和公私起诉刑事案件的诉讼程序方面,已经提出了改进刑事诉讼法的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信