Interstitial lung disease in CVID (GLILD): clinical presentation and comparison to CVID without ILD

V. Somogyi, M. Eichinger, F. Lasitschka, J. Kappes, M. Kreuter
{"title":"Interstitial lung disease in CVID (GLILD): clinical presentation and comparison to CVID without ILD","authors":"V. Somogyi, M. Eichinger, F. Lasitschka, J. Kappes, M. Kreuter","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa1409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) patients are susceptible to respiratory diseases including bronchiectasis and granulomatous lymphocytic interstitial lung disease (GLILD). As data on evaluating CVID with and without GLILD are sparse, we aimed to compare these groups. Methods: 21 CVID patients were analyzed retrospectively for characteristics and outcomes and grouped into CVID with (ILD,n=9) and without GLILD (noILD,n=12). CT scoring (CTS) assessed 11 patterns (ground glass opacities, reticulations, traction bronchiectasis, honeycombing, consolidations, air-trapping, nodules, bronchial wall thickening, bronchiectasis, mucus plugging, effusion). Histology scoring (HS) evaluated changes of the bronchial wall and of the interstitium (fibrosis, inflammation, anthracosis, granuloma, tumor, infection, metaplasia, mucoid impactation, microhoneycombing, eosinophilia). Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Most CVID patients received immunoglobulins (Ig) and all ILD patients were treated immunosuppressive (IS). Under Ig and IS lung function remained stable in ILD. CTS were worse for ILD than noILD (ILD:16.5±8.7 vs. noILD:9.4±4.9, p=0.02) while HS (ILD:5.8±2.7, noILD 6.0±2.6) were similar. CTS deteriorated in ILD but not in noILD with pattern changes in ILD, from initial mainly GGO to fibrosis (p Conclusion: CVID with and without GLILD has similar clinical characteristics but differs mainly in CT scoring. Future work has to assess clinical predictors of GLILD.","PeriodicalId":267660,"journal":{"name":"Rare ILD/DPLD","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rare ILD/DPLD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa1409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) patients are susceptible to respiratory diseases including bronchiectasis and granulomatous lymphocytic interstitial lung disease (GLILD). As data on evaluating CVID with and without GLILD are sparse, we aimed to compare these groups. Methods: 21 CVID patients were analyzed retrospectively for characteristics and outcomes and grouped into CVID with (ILD,n=9) and without GLILD (noILD,n=12). CT scoring (CTS) assessed 11 patterns (ground glass opacities, reticulations, traction bronchiectasis, honeycombing, consolidations, air-trapping, nodules, bronchial wall thickening, bronchiectasis, mucus plugging, effusion). Histology scoring (HS) evaluated changes of the bronchial wall and of the interstitium (fibrosis, inflammation, anthracosis, granuloma, tumor, infection, metaplasia, mucoid impactation, microhoneycombing, eosinophilia). Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Most CVID patients received immunoglobulins (Ig) and all ILD patients were treated immunosuppressive (IS). Under Ig and IS lung function remained stable in ILD. CTS were worse for ILD than noILD (ILD:16.5±8.7 vs. noILD:9.4±4.9, p=0.02) while HS (ILD:5.8±2.7, noILD 6.0±2.6) were similar. CTS deteriorated in ILD but not in noILD with pattern changes in ILD, from initial mainly GGO to fibrosis (p Conclusion: CVID with and without GLILD has similar clinical characteristics but differs mainly in CT scoring. Future work has to assess clinical predictors of GLILD.
间质性肺疾病CVID (GLILD):临床表现和与无ILD的CVID的比较
简介:常见变异性免疫缺陷(CVID)患者易患呼吸道疾病,包括支气管扩张和肉芽肿性淋巴细胞间质性肺疾病(GLILD)。由于评估有无GLILD的CVID的数据很少,我们的目的是比较这些组。方法:回顾性分析21例CVID患者的特征和结局,并将其分为有ILD (n =9)和无GLILD (n =12)两组。CT评分(CTS)评估了11种征象(磨玻璃混浊、网状、牵引支气管扩张、蜂窝状、实变、气陷、结节、支气管壁增厚、支气管扩张、粘液堵塞、积液)。组织学评分(HS)评估支气管壁和间质的变化(纤维化、炎症、炭疽、肉芽肿、肿瘤、感染、化生、粘液嵌塞、微蜂窝、嗜酸性粒细胞增多)。结果:两组间基线特征相似。大多数CVID患者接受免疫球蛋白(Ig)治疗,所有ILD患者接受免疫抑制剂(IS)治疗。Ig和IS下,ILD患者肺功能保持稳定。CTS对ILD的诊断差于noILD (ILD:16.5±8.7 vs. noILD:9.4±4.9,p=0.02), HS (ILD:5.8±2.7,noILD 6.0±2.6)相似。CTS在ILD中恶化,但在ILD中没有恶化,并且ILD的模式发生了变化,从最初主要是GGO到纤维化(p结论:CVID合并和不合并GLILD的临床特征相似,但主要在CT评分上存在差异。未来的工作必须评估GLILD的临床预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信