Determination of School Leaders’ Values, Their Levels of Practice and Differences

Jeffri Idris
{"title":"Determination of School Leaders’ Values, Their Levels of Practice and Differences","authors":"Jeffri Idris","doi":"10.33422/3rd.aretl.2020.12.115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". This study sought to get a better understanding on the extent of values being considered and practised by the school heads. This is important because school heads, as well as teachers are considered role models by their students and community, therefore these school heads should ‘lead by example’. The objectives of the study were to determine their most favoured values, their levels of practice and their differences. A quantitative approach was used by employing a survey instrument to gather the data. The values assessed were categorized into four domains, namely Basic Values, Professional Values, Morale Values and, Social and Political Values. There were 105 school heads from most parts of the country purposely selected for the study. The respondents were from both primary and secondary schools and comprised both gender. The respondents were required to self assessed their values practice using the five-point Likert Scale items. It was decided that 94 survey questionnaire forms to be selected and analysed. Based on the item analysis, it was concluded that the respondents scored considerably high in all the four domains. It was also discovered that there were no significant differences in the practice of values between primary and secondary school heads, gender and geographical locations. There was also no significant difference in terms of years of experience as school heads. Although their levels of values practice were mostly high, suggestions were made to further strengthened their values-based leadership particularly the Moral Values domain.. It was also suggested that a 360 degree type of assessment to be used in future study to get different perspectives to support the findings of this study. Lastly, this study has contributed to the body of knowledge in terms of values-based leadership among the school heads in the country.","PeriodicalId":174611,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of ‏The 3rd International Conference on Advanced Research in Education, Teaching and Learning","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of ‏The 3rd International Conference on Advanced Research in Education, Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33422/3rd.aretl.2020.12.115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

. This study sought to get a better understanding on the extent of values being considered and practised by the school heads. This is important because school heads, as well as teachers are considered role models by their students and community, therefore these school heads should ‘lead by example’. The objectives of the study were to determine their most favoured values, their levels of practice and their differences. A quantitative approach was used by employing a survey instrument to gather the data. The values assessed were categorized into four domains, namely Basic Values, Professional Values, Morale Values and, Social and Political Values. There were 105 school heads from most parts of the country purposely selected for the study. The respondents were from both primary and secondary schools and comprised both gender. The respondents were required to self assessed their values practice using the five-point Likert Scale items. It was decided that 94 survey questionnaire forms to be selected and analysed. Based on the item analysis, it was concluded that the respondents scored considerably high in all the four domains. It was also discovered that there were no significant differences in the practice of values between primary and secondary school heads, gender and geographical locations. There was also no significant difference in terms of years of experience as school heads. Although their levels of values practice were mostly high, suggestions were made to further strengthened their values-based leadership particularly the Moral Values domain.. It was also suggested that a 360 degree type of assessment to be used in future study to get different perspectives to support the findings of this study. Lastly, this study has contributed to the body of knowledge in terms of values-based leadership among the school heads in the country.
学校领导价值观的确定、实践水平及其差异
. 这项研究旨在更好地了解学校校长考虑和实践的价值观的程度。这一点很重要,因为校长和教师都被学生和社区视为榜样,因此这些校长应该“以身作则”。这项研究的目的是确定他们最喜欢的价值观,他们的实践水平和他们的差异。采用定量方法,采用调查仪器收集数据。评估的价值观分为四个领域,即基本价值观、专业价值观、士气价值观和社会和政治价值观。共有105名来自全国大部分地区的校长参与了这项研究。受访者来自小学和中学,男女都有。受访者被要求使用李克特五点量表项目自我评估他们的价值观。决定选取和分析94份调查问卷。根据项目分析,得出的结论是,受访者得分相当高,在所有四个领域。调查还发现,中小学校长、性别和地理位置在价值观实践方面没有显著差异。在担任校长的年数方面也没有显著差异。虽然他们的价值观实践水平大多很高,但建议进一步加强他们基于价值观的领导,特别是道德价值观领域。也有人建议在未来的研究中使用360度的评估,以获得不同的观点来支持本研究的结果。最后,这项研究为该国学校校长基于价值观的领导方面的知识体系做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信