Theory of Sovereignty and the Body Politic in Modern and Contemporary Political Thought

V. Fabbrizi
{"title":"Theory of Sovereignty and the Body Politic in Modern and Contemporary Political Thought","authors":"V. Fabbrizi","doi":"10.17846/pc.2019.4.1.3-19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to investigate one of the most interesting and debated issues within the philosophical discussion about politics: the metaphor of the body politic and its relation with the theory of sovereignty in contemporary political theory. After an opening section, which proposes a brief sketch about the origin of the body politic within phi losophy (especially in Plato’s and Aristotle’s contributions), the article provides a theoretical insight of such a theory, by dealing with three of its definitions: Kantorowicz’s “king’s two bodies”; Hobbes’ Leviathan and Schmitt’s theory of sove reignty. The article aims at presenting some arguments to define these three perspectives, by examining – in the last section – how this paradigm has evolved into the more complex and articulated theory of the rule of law in contemporary de mocratic societies.","PeriodicalId":166511,"journal":{"name":"Philosophica Critica","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophica Critica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17846/pc.2019.4.1.3-19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to investigate one of the most interesting and debated issues within the philosophical discussion about politics: the metaphor of the body politic and its relation with the theory of sovereignty in contemporary political theory. After an opening section, which proposes a brief sketch about the origin of the body politic within phi losophy (especially in Plato’s and Aristotle’s contributions), the article provides a theoretical insight of such a theory, by dealing with three of its definitions: Kantorowicz’s “king’s two bodies”; Hobbes’ Leviathan and Schmitt’s theory of sove reignty. The article aims at presenting some arguments to define these three perspectives, by examining – in the last section – how this paradigm has evolved into the more complex and articulated theory of the rule of law in contemporary de mocratic societies.
主权论与现当代政治思想中的政治体
本文的目的是探讨政治哲学讨论中最有趣和最具争议的问题之一:当代政治理论中政治体的隐喻及其与主权理论的关系。在开篇部分,简要介绍了phi哲学(尤其是柏拉图和亚里士多德的贡献)中政治体的起源之后,文章通过处理其三个定义,提供了这种理论的理论见解:坎特罗维茨的“国王的两个身体”;霍布斯的利维坦和施密特的主权理论。本文的目的是提出一些论点来定义这三种观点,在最后一部分中考察这种范式是如何演变成当代民主社会中更复杂、更清晰的法治理论的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信