Human Mobility and Dismantling Cultural Dominance

B. Fairman, Adam Voak, H. Babacan
{"title":"Human Mobility and Dismantling Cultural Dominance","authors":"B. Fairman, Adam Voak, H. Babacan","doi":"10.25120/jre.2.1.2022.3917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rapidly increasing effects of globalisation is currently challenging many countries in ASEAN to think more creatively around their approach to human capability development to ensure economic viability. The intensified crossing of national and cultural borders, the emergence of transcendent communication technologies, and the increasing ease of human mobility are reshaping our approaches to international engagement and collaboration. These cross-cultural interactions will become even more important in a post-Covid-19 world as markets and trade open and a renewed effort to aggressively compete for limited talent begins. The future of the workforce is facing significant disruptions, and the competition for talent takes place from a global pool in which many nations are competing. This paper argues that intercultural approaches in business and management are critical to operating in this global environment. In an attempt to more clearly understand the intercultural management approaches needed in this interconnected, interdependent and globalised trading environment, this paper has used an action research approach to examine what (Hollingsworth & Cody, 1995) describes as ‘relational knowledge’. These structured collaborative conversations have their origins in practitioner interactions within human capability development interventions in Indonesia. It is intended that the cultural responses received from our Indonesian project partners and collaborators will form the basis for a meaningful approach to respectful engagement. By framing the action research cycle through an examination of the impacts on human mobility, we can reveal the layers of cultural dominance. The authors concur with (Nagle, 2009) and (Rattansi, 2011), who both view interculturalism as a valuable enabler to encourage cross-cultural dialogue and challenge self-segregation tendencies within cultures.","PeriodicalId":392988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Resilient Economies (ISSN: 2653-1917)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Resilient Economies (ISSN: 2653-1917)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25120/jre.2.1.2022.3917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The rapidly increasing effects of globalisation is currently challenging many countries in ASEAN to think more creatively around their approach to human capability development to ensure economic viability. The intensified crossing of national and cultural borders, the emergence of transcendent communication technologies, and the increasing ease of human mobility are reshaping our approaches to international engagement and collaboration. These cross-cultural interactions will become even more important in a post-Covid-19 world as markets and trade open and a renewed effort to aggressively compete for limited talent begins. The future of the workforce is facing significant disruptions, and the competition for talent takes place from a global pool in which many nations are competing. This paper argues that intercultural approaches in business and management are critical to operating in this global environment. In an attempt to more clearly understand the intercultural management approaches needed in this interconnected, interdependent and globalised trading environment, this paper has used an action research approach to examine what (Hollingsworth & Cody, 1995) describes as ‘relational knowledge’. These structured collaborative conversations have their origins in practitioner interactions within human capability development interventions in Indonesia. It is intended that the cultural responses received from our Indonesian project partners and collaborators will form the basis for a meaningful approach to respectful engagement. By framing the action research cycle through an examination of the impacts on human mobility, we can reveal the layers of cultural dominance. The authors concur with (Nagle, 2009) and (Rattansi, 2011), who both view interculturalism as a valuable enabler to encourage cross-cultural dialogue and challenge self-segregation tendencies within cultures.
人类流动与文化支配地位的瓦解
全球化的影响正在迅速增加,这对东盟许多国家提出了挑战,要求它们围绕人力能力发展的方法进行更有创造性的思考,以确保经济的可行性。国家和文化边界的日益跨越,卓越的通信技术的出现,以及人类流动的日益便利,正在重塑我们的国际参与和合作方式。随着市场和贸易的开放,以及为争夺有限人才而展开的新一轮激烈竞争,这些跨文化互动在新冠肺炎疫情后的世界将变得更加重要。劳动力的未来正面临着重大的颠覆,人才的竞争发生在许多国家都在竞争的全球资源库中。本文认为,商业和管理中的跨文化方法对于在这种全球环境中运作至关重要。为了更清楚地理解在这个相互联系、相互依存和全球化的贸易环境中所需要的跨文化管理方法,本文使用了一种行动研究方法来检验(Hollingsworth & Cody, 1995)所描述的“关系知识”。这些结构化的协作对话起源于印度尼西亚人类能力发展干预措施中的从业者互动。我们希望从印尼项目合作伙伴和合作者那里收到的文化回应将成为尊重参与的有意义方法的基础。通过考察对人类流动性的影响来构建行动研究周期,我们可以揭示文化支配的层次。作者同意(Nagle, 2009)和(Rattansi, 2011)的观点,他们都认为跨文化主义是鼓励跨文化对话和挑战文化内部自我隔离倾向的有价值的推手。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信