Caleb Was Right: Pretrial Decisions Determine Mostly Everything

C. McCoy
{"title":"Caleb Was Right: Pretrial Decisions Determine Mostly Everything","authors":"C. McCoy","doi":"10.15779/Z38D324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Caleb Foote taught his students many things, and he taught them well. His criminal procedure class was basically a political science course. He looked at the questions of whether and how to apply the criminal sanction from the viewpoint of interest-group politics; he was primarily concerned that everyone should understand that the Constitution was designed to protect unpopular minorities (in the Madisonian sense) from being crushed. To him, examples of unpopular minorities were vagrants (today called \"the homeless\"), poor people, people of color, political dissidents but most comprehensively, those finding themselves on the receiving end of the nasty business of criminal prosecution. Perhaps he was so concerned and committed to social justice for people accused of crimes because he himself had been the object of prosecution as a conscientious objector. Perhaps his passion came from his Quaker ideals. Perhaps he was just contrarian by nature. Whatever its source, Caleb's verve in analyzing how the criminal justice system was used to control unpopular people led to a focus on the earliest stages of prosecution because, as he once told me, \"That's where the greatest number of people get thwacked.\" I suppose he was really thinking of a different verb, but he was polite, and I liked the comic-book sound of it. As one of the teaching assistants for his undergraduate course in criminal law and procedure, I had to lead the small seminar groups that discussed the concepts Caleb had presented in the class's large lectures. The clever undergraduates were convinced that problems of crime and justice could be solved if the police could arrest a lot of people but good judges would later sort out any problems. \"No,\" Caleb directed his teaching assistants, \"tell them that the problem is arrests themselves in other words, overcriminalization. Tell them that at the lower levels of crime seriousness, judges don't really care much about guilt or innocence, but about taking a swipe at these jerks who are committing anti-social acts-if not the act actually charged, then some other act recorded in a lengthy rap sheet and moving the caseload","PeriodicalId":386851,"journal":{"name":"Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38D324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Caleb Foote taught his students many things, and he taught them well. His criminal procedure class was basically a political science course. He looked at the questions of whether and how to apply the criminal sanction from the viewpoint of interest-group politics; he was primarily concerned that everyone should understand that the Constitution was designed to protect unpopular minorities (in the Madisonian sense) from being crushed. To him, examples of unpopular minorities were vagrants (today called "the homeless"), poor people, people of color, political dissidents but most comprehensively, those finding themselves on the receiving end of the nasty business of criminal prosecution. Perhaps he was so concerned and committed to social justice for people accused of crimes because he himself had been the object of prosecution as a conscientious objector. Perhaps his passion came from his Quaker ideals. Perhaps he was just contrarian by nature. Whatever its source, Caleb's verve in analyzing how the criminal justice system was used to control unpopular people led to a focus on the earliest stages of prosecution because, as he once told me, "That's where the greatest number of people get thwacked." I suppose he was really thinking of a different verb, but he was polite, and I liked the comic-book sound of it. As one of the teaching assistants for his undergraduate course in criminal law and procedure, I had to lead the small seminar groups that discussed the concepts Caleb had presented in the class's large lectures. The clever undergraduates were convinced that problems of crime and justice could be solved if the police could arrest a lot of people but good judges would later sort out any problems. "No," Caleb directed his teaching assistants, "tell them that the problem is arrests themselves in other words, overcriminalization. Tell them that at the lower levels of crime seriousness, judges don't really care much about guilt or innocence, but about taking a swipe at these jerks who are committing anti-social acts-if not the act actually charged, then some other act recorded in a lengthy rap sheet and moving the caseload
凯勒是对的:审前决定几乎决定了一切
凯莱布·富特教了他的学生很多东西,而且教得很好。他的刑事诉讼课程基本上是一门政治学课程。他从利益集团政治的角度考察了刑事制裁是否适用以及如何适用的问题;他主要关心的是每个人都应该明白,宪法的目的是保护不受欢迎的少数群体(在麦迪逊的意义上)不受压制。对他来说,不受欢迎的少数群体的例子包括流浪者(今天被称为“无家可归者”)、穷人、有色人种、持不同政见者,但最全面的是,那些发现自己处于肮脏的刑事起诉的接受端。也许他如此关心和致力于为被指控犯罪的人伸张社会正义,是因为他自己曾作为良心拒服兵役者被起诉。也许他的激情来自于贵格会的理想。也许他天生就是个逆向投资者。不管其来源是什么,凯莱布在分析刑事司法系统如何被用来控制不受欢迎的人方面的热情,导致他把重点放在了起诉的最初阶段,因为正如他曾经告诉我的那样,“这是大多数人受到打击的地方。”我猜他其实在想一个不同的动词,但他很有礼貌,我喜欢它的漫画书的声音。作为他的刑法与诉讼程序本科课程的助教之一,我必须领导一个小型的研讨会小组,讨论凯莱布在课堂上的大型讲座中提出的概念。聪明的大学生们相信,如果警察能逮捕很多人,犯罪和司法问题就能得到解决,但好的法官会在以后解决任何问题。“不,”凯莱布对他的助教说,“告诉他们问题在于逮捕本身,换句话说,就是过度定罪。告诉他们,在犯罪严重程度较低的情况下,法官并不真正关心有罪或无罪,而是对这些犯下反社会行为的混蛋进行严厉打击——如果不是实际指控的行为,那么就会有其他一些行为记录在冗长的犯罪记录表上,从而转移案件负担
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信