Nilai-Nilai Yang Hidup Dalam Masyarakat (Living Constitution) Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Pada Perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2004 Tentang Sumber Daya Air

STAATSRECHT: Indonesian Constitutional Law Journal Pub Date : 2019-06-24 DOI:10.15408/SICLJ.V3I1.13835

Bening Irsa Setara Bulan, Abu Tamrin, Sodikin Sodikin

{"title":"Nilai-Nilai Yang Hidup Dalam Masyarakat (Living Constitution) Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Pada Perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2004 Tentang Sumber Daya Air","authors":"Bening Irsa Setara Bulan, Abu Tamrin, Sodikin Sodikin","doi":"10.15408/SICLJ.V3I1.13835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract.The Constitutional Court is an institution that has the role of the guardian of the constitution. The Constitutional Court must ensure the supremacy of the constitution, and the constitution is carried out consistently in society. As the guardian of the constitusion, the constitutional court is attached to the authority of judicial review. The decision on testing the Law on Natural Resources has two different decisions which are caused by the interpretation of the Constitutional Court judges on Article 33 Paragraph (2), Paragraph (3), and Paragraph (4) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The judge relies on his interpretation of the value of community development, especially to the value of water resources. This on the one hand has resulted in legal uncertainty, but on the other hand it includes the efforts of judges to harmonize the rules of constitutional law as living constitution to be in accordance with the development of society.Keywords: The Living Constitution, RI Constitutional Court","PeriodicalId":299133,"journal":{"name":"STAATSRECHT: Indonesian Constitutional Law Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STAATSRECHT: Indonesian Constitutional Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15408/SICLJ.V3I1.13835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract.The Constitutional Court is an institution that has the role of the guardian of the constitution. The Constitutional Court must ensure the supremacy of the constitution, and the constitution is carried out consistently in society. As the guardian of the constitusion, the constitutional court is attached to the authority of judicial review. The decision on testing the Law on Natural Resources has two different decisions which are caused by the interpretation of the Constitutional Court judges on Article 33 Paragraph (2), Paragraph (3), and Paragraph (4) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The judge relies on his interpretation of the value of community development, especially to the value of water resources. This on the one hand has resulted in legal uncertainty, but on the other hand it includes the efforts of judges to harmonize the rules of constitutional law as living constitution to be in accordance with the development of society.Keywords: The Living Constitution, RI Constitutional Court

查看原文本刊更多论文

摘要。宪法法院是具有宪法守护者作用的机构。宪法法院必须确保宪法的至上性，确保宪法在社会上的贯彻执行。宪法法院作为宪法的守护者，具有司法审查的权力。关于检验《自然资源法》的决定有两个不同的决定，这是宪法法院法官对1945年《印度尼西亚共和国宪法》第33条第(2)款、第(3)款和第(4)款的解释造成的。法官依据的是他对社区发展价值的解读，尤其是对水资源价值的解读。这一方面造成了法律的不确定性，但另一方面也包括法官为使宪法规则作为活宪法与社会发展相适应而作出的协调努力。关键词:活宪法，国际扶轮宪法法院

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

STAATSRECHT: Indonesian Constitutional Law Journal

自引率

0.00%

发文量