Reading Marx

Reading Marx, S. Žižek, Frank Ruda
{"title":"Reading Marx","authors":"Reading Marx, S. Žižek, Frank Ruda","doi":"10.1163/9789004300637_008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reading Marx consists of a co-written introduction and conclusion, plus an unsigned essay by each of the authors, Slavoj Žižek, Frank Ruda, and Agon Hamza, in that order. The introduction, ‘Unexpected Reunions’, sets forth the aim of the book: to give distinct philosophical readings of Marx. The authors take this to mean that they will not celebrate Marx, defend him unconditionally, or dissect the living and dead elements of Marx’s corpus, but ‘read and thus think with Marx as a contemporary’ (p. 3). This is a distinction without a difference, since to take the living elements of Marx’s work is to treat his ideas as of contemporary significance. More significantly, the authors ground the need for a contemporary philosophical treatment of Marx in the closure of emancipatory possibilities engendered by the rise of authoritarian political and capitalist forms, which have severed the putative link between capitalism and democracy posited by Fukuyama’s ‘end of history’ thesis (p. 4). I do not think that the authors have really said very much about these emancipatory possibilities, although they say a little about how the sphere of possibility has been reinterpreted to exclude alternatives to capitalism. On their account, Marxist philosophy can intervene in this history by demonstrating the modal conversion of specific historical impossibilities of radical political and economic transformation ‘into a new possibility (of emancipation)’ (p. 2). To demonstrate this capability, it is necessary first to recognize that Marxism is multivalent and that without its revolutionary force, it can become canonized, sacralized, and thereby disconnected from the present concrete situation (p. 5). Each of these aims is salutary but its promise unfulfilled. In fact, a great deal of the work of the text actually involves reading Marxist thought in(to) Hegel. The first essay, ‘Marx Reads Object-Oriented Ontology’, is by Žižek, Professor at the Institute of Sociology, Ljubljana, Slovenia, and perhaps the most famous living philosopher. Žižek is particularly notable for his unexpected juxtapositions of Marxist–Hegelian philosophy with Lacan and popular culture. Here, he brings in Graham Harman’s object-oriented ontology (a term coined by Levi Bryant), a recent neo-Heideggerian movement that overturns the primacy of subjects over","PeriodicalId":396991,"journal":{"name":"Red Banners, Books and Beer Mugs: The Mental World of German Social Democrats, 1863–1914","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Red Banners, Books and Beer Mugs: The Mental World of German Social Democrats, 1863–1914","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004300637_008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reading Marx consists of a co-written introduction and conclusion, plus an unsigned essay by each of the authors, Slavoj Žižek, Frank Ruda, and Agon Hamza, in that order. The introduction, ‘Unexpected Reunions’, sets forth the aim of the book: to give distinct philosophical readings of Marx. The authors take this to mean that they will not celebrate Marx, defend him unconditionally, or dissect the living and dead elements of Marx’s corpus, but ‘read and thus think with Marx as a contemporary’ (p. 3). This is a distinction without a difference, since to take the living elements of Marx’s work is to treat his ideas as of contemporary significance. More significantly, the authors ground the need for a contemporary philosophical treatment of Marx in the closure of emancipatory possibilities engendered by the rise of authoritarian political and capitalist forms, which have severed the putative link between capitalism and democracy posited by Fukuyama’s ‘end of history’ thesis (p. 4). I do not think that the authors have really said very much about these emancipatory possibilities, although they say a little about how the sphere of possibility has been reinterpreted to exclude alternatives to capitalism. On their account, Marxist philosophy can intervene in this history by demonstrating the modal conversion of specific historical impossibilities of radical political and economic transformation ‘into a new possibility (of emancipation)’ (p. 2). To demonstrate this capability, it is necessary first to recognize that Marxism is multivalent and that without its revolutionary force, it can become canonized, sacralized, and thereby disconnected from the present concrete situation (p. 5). Each of these aims is salutary but its promise unfulfilled. In fact, a great deal of the work of the text actually involves reading Marxist thought in(to) Hegel. The first essay, ‘Marx Reads Object-Oriented Ontology’, is by Žižek, Professor at the Institute of Sociology, Ljubljana, Slovenia, and perhaps the most famous living philosopher. Žižek is particularly notable for his unexpected juxtapositions of Marxist–Hegelian philosophy with Lacan and popular culture. Here, he brings in Graham Harman’s object-oriented ontology (a term coined by Levi Bryant), a recent neo-Heideggerian movement that overturns the primacy of subjects over
阅读马克思
《阅读马克思》包括一篇共同撰写的引言和结论,以及三位作者(斯拉沃伊Žižek、弗兰克·鲁达和阿贡·哈姆扎)各自撰写的一篇未署名的文章。引言,“意想不到的团聚”,提出了这本书的目的:给马克思独特的哲学阅读。作者们认为,这意味着他们不会赞美马克思,无条件地为他辩护,也不会剖析马克思语料中活的和死的元素,而是“将马克思作为一个同时代的人来阅读和思考”(第3页)。这是一个没有区别的区别,因为接受马克思作品中的活元素就是将他的思想视为具有当代意义。更重要的是,作者认为需要对马克思进行当代哲学处理,因为专制政治和资本主义形式的兴起导致了解放可能性的终结,这切断了福山“历史的终结”论点所假定的资本主义与民主之间的联系(第4页)。我认为作者并没有真正说过这些解放可能性。尽管他们说了一点关于可能性的范围如何被重新解释,以排除资本主义的替代方案。根据他们的说法,马克思主义哲学可以通过展示激进政治和经济转型的特定历史不可能性“转化为一种新的(解放)可能性”(第2页)来干预这一历史。为了证明这种能力,首先有必要认识到马克思主义是多重的,没有它的革命力量,它可以被册封,神圣化,因此与当前的具体情况脱节(第5页)。每一个目标都是有益的,但它的承诺没有实现。事实上,文本的大量工作实际上涉及到阅读黑格尔的马克思主义思想。第一篇文章《马克思解读面向对象的本体论》由Žižek撰写,他是斯洛文尼亚卢布尔雅那社会学研究所的教授,也许是最著名的在世哲学家。Žižek特别值得注意的是,他出人意料地将马克思黑格尔哲学与拉康和流行文化并列在一起。在这里,他引入了Graham Harman的面向对象本体(一个由Levi Bryant创造的术语),这是最近的新海德格尔运动,推翻了主体的首要地位
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信