Writing Politics: Ottoman Governmentality and the Language of Reports

M. S. Saraçoğlu
{"title":"Writing Politics: Ottoman Governmentality and the Language of Reports","authors":"M. S. Saraçoğlu","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474430999.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter focuses on the official correspondence between Vidin’s administrative council and the provincial capital, Ruse. These reports pertaining to events in Vidin County were a part of the political procedures of the local judicio-administrative sphere. As such, politics of local administration influenced the official correspondence and our understanding of the events in Vidin County. The writing of reports and petitions and other provincial administrative/judicial practices (such as interrogations) constituted a significant part of Ottoman governmentality. Those who could shape how the official correspondence was constructed gained advantage in local political economy. Such correspondence was an essential component of how provincial Ottoman government functioned; therefore, reports, petitions, false accusations, and interrogations became important tools for agents and groups who were engaged in hegemonic negotiations. Both elite and non-elite agents were able to utilize Ottoman governance to pursue their own strategies against other local agents or imperial government. People who refused to use these bureaucratic tools in making claims and negotiating were presented in this correspondence as defiant stubborn and violent. This perspective is critical of the state–society divide, as the case studies reveal a more complex singular government of state and society.","PeriodicalId":173255,"journal":{"name":"Nineteenth-Century Local Governance in Ottoman Bulgaria","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nineteenth-Century Local Governance in Ottoman Bulgaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474430999.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the official correspondence between Vidin’s administrative council and the provincial capital, Ruse. These reports pertaining to events in Vidin County were a part of the political procedures of the local judicio-administrative sphere. As such, politics of local administration influenced the official correspondence and our understanding of the events in Vidin County. The writing of reports and petitions and other provincial administrative/judicial practices (such as interrogations) constituted a significant part of Ottoman governmentality. Those who could shape how the official correspondence was constructed gained advantage in local political economy. Such correspondence was an essential component of how provincial Ottoman government functioned; therefore, reports, petitions, false accusations, and interrogations became important tools for agents and groups who were engaged in hegemonic negotiations. Both elite and non-elite agents were able to utilize Ottoman governance to pursue their own strategies against other local agents or imperial government. People who refused to use these bureaucratic tools in making claims and negotiating were presented in this correspondence as defiant stubborn and violent. This perspective is critical of the state–society divide, as the case studies reveal a more complex singular government of state and society.
写作政治:奥斯曼统治与报告语言
这一章的重点是维丁的行政委员会和省会鲁塞之间的官方通信。这些关于维丁县事件的报告是地方司法行政领域政治程序的一部分。因此,地方行政政治影响了官方通信和我们对维丁县事件的理解。撰写报告和请愿书以及其他省级行政/司法做法(例如审讯)是奥斯曼统治的重要组成部分。那些能够塑造公文结构的人在地方政治经济中占有优势。这种通信是奥斯曼省政府运作的重要组成部分;因此,报告、请愿、诬告和审讯成为从事霸权谈判的代理人和团体的重要工具。精英和非精英代理人都能够利用奥斯曼帝国的统治来追求自己的战略,以对抗其他地方代理人或帝国政府。在这些信件中,拒绝使用这些官僚工具来提出要求和谈判的人被认为是挑衅、顽固和暴力的。这种观点批判了国家与社会的分裂,因为案例研究揭示了一个更复杂的国家与社会的单一政府。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信