Trust, Perceptions of Corruption, and Demand for Regulation: Evidence from Post-Socialist Countries

Valentina Dimitrova-Grajzl, Peter Grajzl, A. Guse
{"title":"Trust, Perceptions of Corruption, and Demand for Regulation: Evidence from Post-Socialist Countries","authors":"Valentina Dimitrova-Grajzl, Peter Grajzl, A. Guse","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1849224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While the tradeoff between market failure and government failure has been explored both theoretically and in practical policy design, the question of whether this trade-off appears in the calculus of citizens’ demands for government regulation remains underexplored. We first clarify the channels through which concerns for market failure, as proxied by trust in market participants, and concerns for government failure, as proxied by perceptions of corruption, jointly affect individuals’ demand for government regulation. We then investigate these effects empirically, using data from post-socialist countries. Our analysis confirms the previously established result that trust has a negative effect on demand for regulation. Perceived corruption, however, affects demand for regulation primarily via a negative interaction effect with trust. Our findings suggest that, in post-socialist countries, both concerns for market failure and concerns for government failure are indeed in citizens’ minds and that concerns about the anticipated ‘grabbing-hand’ effect from government involvement are particularly salient.","PeriodicalId":113084,"journal":{"name":"Law & Prosociality eJournal","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"47","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Prosociality eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1849224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47

Abstract

While the tradeoff between market failure and government failure has been explored both theoretically and in practical policy design, the question of whether this trade-off appears in the calculus of citizens’ demands for government regulation remains underexplored. We first clarify the channels through which concerns for market failure, as proxied by trust in market participants, and concerns for government failure, as proxied by perceptions of corruption, jointly affect individuals’ demand for government regulation. We then investigate these effects empirically, using data from post-socialist countries. Our analysis confirms the previously established result that trust has a negative effect on demand for regulation. Perceived corruption, however, affects demand for regulation primarily via a negative interaction effect with trust. Our findings suggest that, in post-socialist countries, both concerns for market failure and concerns for government failure are indeed in citizens’ minds and that concerns about the anticipated ‘grabbing-hand’ effect from government involvement are particularly salient.
信任、腐败观念与监管需求:来自后社会主义国家的证据
虽然市场失灵和政府失灵之间的权衡在理论和实际政策设计中都得到了探讨,但这种权衡是否出现在公民对政府监管需求的计算中,这一问题仍未得到充分探讨。我们首先澄清了对市场失灵的担忧(以对市场参与者的信任为代表)和对政府失灵的担忧(以对腐败的认知为代表)共同影响个人对政府监管需求的渠道。然后,我们使用后社会主义国家的数据对这些影响进行了实证研究。我们的分析证实了先前建立的结果,即信任对监管需求有负面影响。然而,感知腐败主要通过与信任的负交互作用影响监管需求。我们的研究结果表明,在后社会主义国家,对市场失灵的担忧和对政府失灵的担忧确实存在于公民的脑海中,而对政府参与预期的“掠夺之手”效应的担忧尤为突出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信