Die Entfesselung der Alten. Bettgitter in den Sicherheitsdispositiven der Pflege

M. Keil
{"title":"Die Entfesselung der Alten. Bettgitter in den Sicherheitsdispositiven der Pflege","authors":"M. Keil","doi":"10.1553/virus16s231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of in hospitals nursing homes has been a subject of controversy for decades. However, analysis of the literature about bedrails reveals that the issue of use and misuse of mechanical restraints via bedrails is very complex and cannot be explained by indi-vidual factors. It involves several actors in addition to patients: nurses, hospital administration, relatives, doctors, insurance companies, manufacturers, lawyers, and so on. After years of criticism and many injured patients, bedrails are still in common use in hospitals and nursing homes. Consequently, I argue that bedrails are more than just poorly designed, mundane objects; they are integral components of the “apparatus of security” (Foucault): Besides pre-venting people from falling out of bed – which they may or may not do – they secure specific circulations, such as movements of people and things, in hospital and nursing home settings. maßgeblichen aufgenommen","PeriodicalId":343383,"journal":{"name":"VIRUS - Beiträge zur Sozialgeschichte der Medizin","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VIRUS - Beiträge zur Sozialgeschichte der Medizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1553/virus16s231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of in hospitals nursing homes has been a subject of controversy for decades. However, analysis of the literature about bedrails reveals that the issue of use and misuse of mechanical restraints via bedrails is very complex and cannot be explained by indi-vidual factors. It involves several actors in addition to patients: nurses, hospital administration, relatives, doctors, insurance companies, manufacturers, lawyers, and so on. After years of criticism and many injured patients, bedrails are still in common use in hospitals and nursing homes. Consequently, I argue that bedrails are more than just poorly designed, mundane objects; they are integral components of the “apparatus of security” (Foucault): Besides pre-venting people from falling out of bed – which they may or may not do – they secure specific circulations, such as movements of people and things, in hospital and nursing home settings. maßgeblichen aufgenommen
老故事中的火车头在鞋匠亚齐巴德巴托
几十年来,在医院、疗养院使用这种药物一直是一个有争议的话题。然而,对床栏的文献分析表明,通过床栏使用和误用机械约束的问题是非常复杂的,不能用个人因素来解释。除了病人之外,它还涉及到几个行动者:护士、医院管理部门、亲属、医生、保险公司、制造商、律师等等。经过多年的批评和许多受伤的病人,床栏仍然在医院和养老院普遍使用。因此,我认为床轨不仅仅是设计糟糕的普通物品;它们是“安全装置”(福柯)的组成部分:除了防止人们从床上摔下来——这可能会发生,也可能不会发生——它们还确保特定的流通,例如医院和养老院环境中人和物的流动。马ßgeblichen成员
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信