Quotas for Women! The Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002

A. Mcharg
{"title":"Quotas for Women! The Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002","authors":"A. Mcharg","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-6478.2006.00352.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002 is unusual in two respects. First, it is a rare example of the permissible (though not mandatory) use of affirmative action in the United Kingdom, in this case to reduce gender inequality in the selection of election candidates. Secondly, the Act contains a sunset clause and will expire in 2015 unless extended. This article examines the background to the legislation, the forms of affirmative action it permits, and the use so far made of it by political parties. It also considers the justifications for affirmative action to increase women's political representation, asking what sets this apart from other contexts in which women are under-represented, and whether the temporary nature of the legislation is appropriate.","PeriodicalId":173774,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Political Process (Topic)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Political Process (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2006.00352.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002 is unusual in two respects. First, it is a rare example of the permissible (though not mandatory) use of affirmative action in the United Kingdom, in this case to reduce gender inequality in the selection of election candidates. Secondly, the Act contains a sunset clause and will expire in 2015 unless extended. This article examines the background to the legislation, the forms of affirmative action it permits, and the use so far made of it by political parties. It also considers the justifications for affirmative action to increase women's political representation, asking what sets this apart from other contexts in which women are under-represented, and whether the temporary nature of the legislation is appropriate.
女性配额!2002年《性别歧视(选举候选人)法》
《2002年性别歧视(选举候选人)法》在两个方面不同寻常。首先,这是英国允许(尽管不是强制性)使用平权行动的罕见例子,在这种情况下,这是为了减少选举候选人选择中的性别不平等。其次,该法案包含一个日落条款,除非延期,否则将于2015年到期。本文考察了立法的背景,它所允许的平权行动的形式,以及迄今为止各政党对它的使用。它还审议了采取平权行动以增加妇女政治代表性的理由,询问是什么使这种行动有别于妇女代表性不足的其他情况,以及该立法的临时性质是否适当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信