Basic Methods of the History of Political and Legal Doctrines and the Possible Transformation of the Object of Legal Science

A. Kornev
{"title":"Basic Methods of the History of Political and Legal Doctrines and the Possible Transformation of the Object of Legal Science","authors":"A. Kornev","doi":"10.17803/2311-5998.2023.104.4.026-040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article shows the importance of the methodology of the history of political and legal doctrines, characterizes the basic (basic) methods, and illustrates their cognitive capabilities. At the same time, the emphasis is placed on the fact that each doctrine has a methodological basis, which to some extent allows us to evaluate the content of the doctrines and the real possibilities of their implementation in the practice of state-legal construction. The importance of the history of political and legal doctrines is shown in the present period, when the ideological confrontation has become especially aggravated, behind which there is a discrepancy between the interests of global political players. Methods make it possible to study reality and not only political and legal. It seems that it is part of a broader phenomenon, which can be conditionally called sociality. At present, such a category as the techno-social sphere (system) has firmly entered the scientific circulation. The synthesis of natural, social, technological systems is an example of the transformation of the subject area of legal science, and as a result, the interdisciplinarity of scientific research.","PeriodicalId":238867,"journal":{"name":"Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL))","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL))","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2023.104.4.026-040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article shows the importance of the methodology of the history of political and legal doctrines, characterizes the basic (basic) methods, and illustrates their cognitive capabilities. At the same time, the emphasis is placed on the fact that each doctrine has a methodological basis, which to some extent allows us to evaluate the content of the doctrines and the real possibilities of their implementation in the practice of state-legal construction. The importance of the history of political and legal doctrines is shown in the present period, when the ideological confrontation has become especially aggravated, behind which there is a discrepancy between the interests of global political players. Methods make it possible to study reality and not only political and legal. It seems that it is part of a broader phenomenon, which can be conditionally called sociality. At present, such a category as the techno-social sphere (system) has firmly entered the scientific circulation. The synthesis of natural, social, technological systems is an example of the transformation of the subject area of legal science, and as a result, the interdisciplinarity of scientific research.
政法学说史的基本方法与法学研究对象的可能转换
本文阐述了政法学说史方法论的重要性,阐述了基本(基本)方法的特点,并说明了它们的认知能力。与此同时,本书强调的是,每一种学说都有其方法论基础,这在一定程度上使我们能够评估这些学说的内容,以及它们在国家法制建设实践中实施的真实可能性。在意识形态对抗尤其加剧的今天,政治与法律学说的历史重要性得到了体现,而意识形态对抗的背后是全球政治参与者之间的利益差异。方法使研究现实成为可能,而不仅仅是研究政治和法律。这似乎是一种更广泛的现象的一部分,这种现象可以有条件地称为社会性。目前,技术-社会领域(系统)这一范畴已经牢固地进入了科学循环。自然系统、社会系统和技术系统的综合是法学学科领域转变的一个例子,并由此产生了科学研究的跨学科性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信