Jewish Resistance against the Nazis

A. Groth
{"title":"Jewish Resistance against the Nazis","authors":"A. Groth","doi":"10.5860/choice.186054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Jewish Resistance Against the Nazis, by Patrick Henry, ed., Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University Press of America, 2014,630 pp.Reviewed by ALEXANDER J. GROTHPatrick Henry, Cushing Eells Professor Emeritus of Philosophy, Literature and Foreign Languages at Whitman College, has assembled a collection of variously informative and generally well-written essays on a subject of major importance in the field of Holocaust studies. The articles in Henrys anthology confront a pernicious myth of longstanding: that the Jews who perished in the Shoah \"were led like sheep to the slaughter.\" As Henry notes in his introduction, this idea transfers the blame for the monstrous crime to the victims partly because, in the distorted Nazi psyche, those who would not defend themselves had \"no right to live.\" Such an accusation also helps exonerate the passive by-standers because \"if the Jews did nothing to save themselves, why should others have risked their lives to help them?\" (XIII).Major Jewish scholars, such as Raul Hilberg and Hannah Arendt, notoriously took up the theme ofan alleged Jewish passivity during the Holocaust. In Eichmann in Jerusalem ( 1963), Arendt went so far as to label the role of Jewish leaders in the destruction of their own people as \"undoubtedly the darkest chapter of the whole dark story.\" The motives for this grossly unjustified interpretation of the Jewish catastrophe may never be known completely. Professor Henrys book challenges these mistaken conclusions. His selection of essays, however, is somewhat odd.The Henry collection classifies Jewish resistance in four different ways: type of resistance; geographic distribution of resistance; chronology of resistance; and the role and contribution of Jews to national resistance movements in Nazi-occupied countries. A major form of resistance described here involves what Professor Yehuda Bauer called amidah, a concept that includes cultural, educational, religious, and political activities, and indeed, all actions intended to strengthen health and morale among Jews, not only armed rebellion or the use of force. This theme is explored further by Dalia Ofer, \"Modes of Jewish Resistance in Eastern European Ghettos,\" (366-392). Similarly, Joanna B. Michlic, \"Jewish Children and Youth in German-Occupied Poland\" deals with rescue activities through efforts that did not involve violent confrontations with the killers. Nick Strimples \"Music as Resistance,\" (319-338) also comes in this category. In \"Jewish Resistance in Nazi Germany and Austria, 1933-1946,\" Dieter Kunz describes the activities of physicians and nurses in the Jewish Hospital in Berlin who opposed the prevailing Nazi policies and went to extraordinary lengths in order to save the lives of Jewish patients. And, Deborah Dwork writes about \"Childrens Resistance both through Diary Writing and Song\" (279-299).This volume also contains articles on armed resistance by Jews, such as the struggle led by the Bielski brothers in the forests of Belarus and Jewish resistance in the Ukraine, often in conjunction with and, occasionally together with Soviet partisans, as described by Yehuda Bauer (483-503). The lesser known, albeit important Jewish resistance in Slovakia appears in the article by Hana Kubatova (504-518) and Jewish resistance in Hungary in the articles by Gabor Kadar, Schmidt van de Zandan and Zollan Vagi (519-546). The latter conclude that \"Jews were by far the most actively resisting victim group in the Nazi concentration camp universe... besides typhus, it was onlyjews who killed SS men in Auschwitz until the arrival of the Red Army\" (546). In \"Resistance in the Camps\" (547-593), Robert Van Pelt emphasizes the appalling conditions under which Jews lived in the camps and their inability to change the horrendous odds against them. However, he also mentions the revolts of the Sonderkommando in Treblinka, on August 2, 1943; in Sobibor, October 14, 1943 and in Auschwitz-Birkenau, October 7, 1944. …","PeriodicalId":152917,"journal":{"name":"Jewish Political Studies Review","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jewish Political Studies Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.186054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Jewish Resistance Against the Nazis, by Patrick Henry, ed., Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University Press of America, 2014,630 pp.Reviewed by ALEXANDER J. GROTHPatrick Henry, Cushing Eells Professor Emeritus of Philosophy, Literature and Foreign Languages at Whitman College, has assembled a collection of variously informative and generally well-written essays on a subject of major importance in the field of Holocaust studies. The articles in Henrys anthology confront a pernicious myth of longstanding: that the Jews who perished in the Shoah "were led like sheep to the slaughter." As Henry notes in his introduction, this idea transfers the blame for the monstrous crime to the victims partly because, in the distorted Nazi psyche, those who would not defend themselves had "no right to live." Such an accusation also helps exonerate the passive by-standers because "if the Jews did nothing to save themselves, why should others have risked their lives to help them?" (XIII).Major Jewish scholars, such as Raul Hilberg and Hannah Arendt, notoriously took up the theme ofan alleged Jewish passivity during the Holocaust. In Eichmann in Jerusalem ( 1963), Arendt went so far as to label the role of Jewish leaders in the destruction of their own people as "undoubtedly the darkest chapter of the whole dark story." The motives for this grossly unjustified interpretation of the Jewish catastrophe may never be known completely. Professor Henrys book challenges these mistaken conclusions. His selection of essays, however, is somewhat odd.The Henry collection classifies Jewish resistance in four different ways: type of resistance; geographic distribution of resistance; chronology of resistance; and the role and contribution of Jews to national resistance movements in Nazi-occupied countries. A major form of resistance described here involves what Professor Yehuda Bauer called amidah, a concept that includes cultural, educational, religious, and political activities, and indeed, all actions intended to strengthen health and morale among Jews, not only armed rebellion or the use of force. This theme is explored further by Dalia Ofer, "Modes of Jewish Resistance in Eastern European Ghettos," (366-392). Similarly, Joanna B. Michlic, "Jewish Children and Youth in German-Occupied Poland" deals with rescue activities through efforts that did not involve violent confrontations with the killers. Nick Strimples "Music as Resistance," (319-338) also comes in this category. In "Jewish Resistance in Nazi Germany and Austria, 1933-1946," Dieter Kunz describes the activities of physicians and nurses in the Jewish Hospital in Berlin who opposed the prevailing Nazi policies and went to extraordinary lengths in order to save the lives of Jewish patients. And, Deborah Dwork writes about "Childrens Resistance both through Diary Writing and Song" (279-299).This volume also contains articles on armed resistance by Jews, such as the struggle led by the Bielski brothers in the forests of Belarus and Jewish resistance in the Ukraine, often in conjunction with and, occasionally together with Soviet partisans, as described by Yehuda Bauer (483-503). The lesser known, albeit important Jewish resistance in Slovakia appears in the article by Hana Kubatova (504-518) and Jewish resistance in Hungary in the articles by Gabor Kadar, Schmidt van de Zandan and Zollan Vagi (519-546). The latter conclude that "Jews were by far the most actively resisting victim group in the Nazi concentration camp universe... besides typhus, it was onlyjews who killed SS men in Auschwitz until the arrival of the Red Army" (546). In "Resistance in the Camps" (547-593), Robert Van Pelt emphasizes the appalling conditions under which Jews lived in the camps and their inability to change the horrendous odds against them. However, he also mentions the revolts of the Sonderkommando in Treblinka, on August 2, 1943; in Sobibor, October 14, 1943 and in Auschwitz-Birkenau, October 7, 1944. …
犹太人抵抗纳粹
《犹太人抵抗纳粹》,帕特里克·亨利主编,华盛顿特区:美国天主教大学出版社,2014年,630页。由亚历山大·j·格罗斯审阅。帕特里克·亨利,惠特曼学院库欣·埃尔斯哲学、文学和外语荣誉教授,汇集了各种信息丰富、写作良好的论文,这些论文在大屠杀研究领域具有重要意义。亨利选集中的文章直面一个长期存在的有害神话:在大屠杀中丧生的犹太人“像羊一样被带到屠宰场”。正如亨利在前言中所指出的那样,这种想法将滔天罪行的责任转移到了受害者身上,部分原因是,在扭曲的纳粹精神中,那些不为自己辩护的人“没有生存的权利”。这样的指控也有助于免除被动旁观者的责任,因为“如果犹太人没有做任何自救的事情,为什么其他人要冒着生命危险帮助他们?”著名的犹太学者,如劳尔·希尔伯格和汉娜·阿伦特,以犹太人在大屠杀期间所谓的被动为主题,臭名昭著。在1963年出版的《艾希曼在耶路撒冷》(Eichmann In Jerusalem)一书中,阿伦特甚至把犹太人领袖在毁灭自己民族中的角色称为“整个黑暗故事中最黑暗的一章”。这种对犹太人灾难的极不合理的解释的动机可能永远不会完全清楚。亨利教授的书挑战了这些错误的结论。然而,他选择的文章有些奇怪。亨利的文集将犹太人的抵抗分为四种不同的方式:抵抗的类型;耐药性的地理分布;抗药年表;以及犹太人在纳粹占领国家的民族抵抗运动中的作用和贡献。这里描述的一种主要抵抗形式涉及耶胡达·鲍尔教授所说的阿米达,这一概念包括文化、教育、宗教和政治活动,实际上包括旨在增强犹太人健康和士气的所有行动,而不仅仅是武装叛乱或使用武力。达利亚·奥弗(Dalia Ofer)在《东欧贫民区的犹太人抵抗模式》(366-392)中进一步探讨了这一主题。同样,乔安娜·b·米奇奇(Joanna B. Michlic)的《德国占领波兰的犹太儿童和青年》(Jewish Children and Youth in German-Occupied Poland)讲述了通过不涉及与凶手暴力对抗的努力进行的救援活动。尼克·斯普林普斯的《音乐作为抵抗》(319-338)也属于这一类。在《1933-1946年纳粹德国和奥地利的犹太人抵抗》一书中,迪特尔·昆茨(Dieter Kunz)描述了柏林犹太医院的医生和护士的活动,他们反对当时的纳粹政策,为了挽救犹太病人的生命而竭尽全力。黛博拉·德沃克(Deborah Dwork)写了《通过日记写作和歌曲来抵抗儿童》(279-299页)。本卷还载有关于犹太人武装抵抗的文章,例如贝尔斯基兄弟在白俄罗斯森林中领导的斗争和犹太人在乌克兰的抵抗,如耶胡达·鲍尔(483-503)所述,这些斗争经常与苏联游击队联合进行,有时也与苏联游击队一起进行。不太为人所知,但重要的是斯洛伐克的犹太人抵抗出现在Hana Kubatova(504-518)的文章中,匈牙利的犹太人抵抗出现在Gabor Kadar, Schmidt van de Zandan和Zollan Vagi(519-546)的文章中。后者的结论是,“犹太人是迄今为止纳粹集中营中最积极抵抗的受害者群体……在红军到来之前,除了斑疹伤寒,只有犹太人在奥斯维辛杀害党卫军。在《集中营中的抵抗》(547-593)一书中,罗伯特·范佩尔强调了犹太人在集中营中骇人听闻的生活条件,以及他们无力改变对自己不利的可怕处境。然而,他也提到了1943年8月2日特遣突击队在特雷布林卡的起义;1943年10月14日在索比堡,1944年10月7日在奥斯威辛-比克瑙。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信