Contrasting temperatures, waterflows, and light: seasonal habitat selection by young Atlantic salmon and brown trout in a boreonemoral river

J. Heggenes, J. G. Dokk
{"title":"Contrasting temperatures, waterflows, and light: seasonal habitat selection by young Atlantic salmon and brown trout in a boreonemoral river","authors":"J. Heggenes, J. G. Dokk","doi":"10.1002/RRR.620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Habitat use and habitat selection by young Atlantic salmon and brown trout were investigated by direct underwater observation. We sampled during winter and summer water temperatures (low: 3–7°C; high: 9–12°C) coinciding with low and high waterflows (12–20 and 60–80 m3 s−1), and during day and night in winter, and on six selected stations in the river. Observations of 396 salmon and 120 trout indicated a distinct seasonal pattern in behaviours and habitat selection. Feeding was the dominant behaviour at high water temperatures during summer. In winter, there was a diurnal pattern in behaviour; both species sheltered in interstitial spaces in the substrate during daylight, but during night held positions on or close to the substrate in slower flowing stream areas. Coarse substrate providing cover was therefore an important habitat factor during daylight at low water temperatures, while slow-flowing water was important during night. Although spatial niche overlap was considerable both in summer and winter, salmon and trout segregated with respect to meso- and microhabitat selection, and relatively more at low temperatures. Both species changed their use of mesohabitats towards more slow-flowing glide/flat habitats in winter. Irrespective of season, trout preferred in general more slow-flowing water than salmon did, but the difference was more pronounced in winter. Salmon used a wider range of water depths and in particular water velocities, than did trout. Both species were less tolerant of high water velocities at low water temperatures. The seasonal and diurnal pattern in habitat selection reported have important implications for habitat research and habitat-hydraulic modelling. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":306887,"journal":{"name":"Regulated Rivers-research & Management","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"83","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulated Rivers-research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/RRR.620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 83

Abstract

Habitat use and habitat selection by young Atlantic salmon and brown trout were investigated by direct underwater observation. We sampled during winter and summer water temperatures (low: 3–7°C; high: 9–12°C) coinciding with low and high waterflows (12–20 and 60–80 m3 s−1), and during day and night in winter, and on six selected stations in the river. Observations of 396 salmon and 120 trout indicated a distinct seasonal pattern in behaviours and habitat selection. Feeding was the dominant behaviour at high water temperatures during summer. In winter, there was a diurnal pattern in behaviour; both species sheltered in interstitial spaces in the substrate during daylight, but during night held positions on or close to the substrate in slower flowing stream areas. Coarse substrate providing cover was therefore an important habitat factor during daylight at low water temperatures, while slow-flowing water was important during night. Although spatial niche overlap was considerable both in summer and winter, salmon and trout segregated with respect to meso- and microhabitat selection, and relatively more at low temperatures. Both species changed their use of mesohabitats towards more slow-flowing glide/flat habitats in winter. Irrespective of season, trout preferred in general more slow-flowing water than salmon did, but the difference was more pronounced in winter. Salmon used a wider range of water depths and in particular water velocities, than did trout. Both species were less tolerant of high water velocities at low water temperatures. The seasonal and diurnal pattern in habitat selection reported have important implications for habitat research and habitat-hydraulic modelling. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
对比温度、水流和光线:大西洋鲑鱼和褐鳟鱼在北部河流中的季节性栖息地选择
采用水下直接观测法对大西洋鲑鱼和褐鳟幼鱼的生境利用和生境选择进行了研究。我们在冬季和夏季的水温(低:3-7°C;高:9-12°C),与低流量和高流量(12-20和60-80 m3 s - 1)一致,冬季白天和黑夜,在河流的六个选定站点。对396条鲑鱼和120条鳟鱼的观察表明,它们的行为和栖息地选择具有明显的季节性特征。夏季水温高时,进食是主要行为。在冬季,它们的行为有昼夜规律;白天,这两种植物都栖息在基质的空隙中,但在夜间,它们在流速较慢的河流区域的基质上或靠近基质。因此,在低水温的白天,提供覆盖的粗糙基质是重要的栖息地因素,而在夜间,缓慢流动的水是重要的。尽管夏季和冬季空间生态位重叠较大,但鲑鱼和鳟鱼在中、微生境选择上存在分离,且在低温条件下相对较多。这两个物种在冬季都改变了它们对中游栖息地的使用,转向了更缓慢流动的滑翔/平坦栖息地。无论季节如何,鳟鱼通常比鲑鱼更喜欢流得慢的水,但这种差异在冬季更为明显。与鳟鱼相比,鲑鱼使用的水深范围更广,尤其是水流速度。这两个物种在低水温下对高流速的耐受性较差。所报道的生境选择的季节和昼夜模式对生境研究和生境水力建模具有重要意义。版权所有©2001约翰威利父子有限公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信