From This Moment: Museum Futures. Conversations with Tom Freudenheim, Anika Walke, and Geoff Ward

Z. D. Doering
{"title":"From This Moment: Museum Futures. Conversations with Tom Freudenheim, Anika Walke, and Geoff Ward","authors":"Z. D. Doering","doi":"10.14361/zkmm-2020-0201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The past year has seen museums, monuments, and memorials hostage to competing narratives of affirmation and condemnation of the very foundations of the United States. Protests and demonstrations demanding a racial reckoning for Black Americans specifically, and all racial/ethnic minority groups, more generally, were added to an existing tsunami of social upheavals. The months of institutional lockdowns, restricted population movement, and a precipitous economic downturn that resulted from the global COVID-19 pandemic have taken a toll. As of this writing, the outcome of the 2020 presidential election portends either a continuation of the present or some relief to the recent governmental instability. After the initial disbelief, as COVID-19 spread unabated, museums around the globe turned to the internet as an alternative to their physical presence. Some pivoted with agility drawing on internal resources and creativity; others lumbered and needed external help. Most created digital analogs of physical offerings, others imagined new forms of interaction and many scurried to document and collect stories and material evidence from the pandemic. In this issue, the responses of cultural institutions and consortia, from Los Angeles, California and Washington, D.C. to Biel, Switzerland and Xi’an, China provide vivid examples. Very few institutions strayed from their avowed missions and collected or distributed food, assisted community members with emergency needs, or provided desperately needed practical and emotional support (DOERING 2020). Museum responses to the calls for a racial reckoning have been mostly eloquent but vapid in support of Black Lives Matter; many promises limited, however, in constructive or innovative approaches to solving institutional racism, enacting major changes in managerial or operational structures, in plans to decolonize collections, or include","PeriodicalId":133836,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cultural Management and Cultural Policy / Zeitschrift für Kulturmanagement und Kulturpolitik","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cultural Management and Cultural Policy / Zeitschrift für Kulturmanagement und Kulturpolitik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14361/zkmm-2020-0201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The past year has seen museums, monuments, and memorials hostage to competing narratives of affirmation and condemnation of the very foundations of the United States. Protests and demonstrations demanding a racial reckoning for Black Americans specifically, and all racial/ethnic minority groups, more generally, were added to an existing tsunami of social upheavals. The months of institutional lockdowns, restricted population movement, and a precipitous economic downturn that resulted from the global COVID-19 pandemic have taken a toll. As of this writing, the outcome of the 2020 presidential election portends either a continuation of the present or some relief to the recent governmental instability. After the initial disbelief, as COVID-19 spread unabated, museums around the globe turned to the internet as an alternative to their physical presence. Some pivoted with agility drawing on internal resources and creativity; others lumbered and needed external help. Most created digital analogs of physical offerings, others imagined new forms of interaction and many scurried to document and collect stories and material evidence from the pandemic. In this issue, the responses of cultural institutions and consortia, from Los Angeles, California and Washington, D.C. to Biel, Switzerland and Xi’an, China provide vivid examples. Very few institutions strayed from their avowed missions and collected or distributed food, assisted community members with emergency needs, or provided desperately needed practical and emotional support (DOERING 2020). Museum responses to the calls for a racial reckoning have been mostly eloquent but vapid in support of Black Lives Matter; many promises limited, however, in constructive or innovative approaches to solving institutional racism, enacting major changes in managerial or operational structures, in plans to decolonize collections, or include
从这一刻开始:博物馆的未来。与汤姆·弗罗伊登海姆、安妮卡·沃克和杰夫·沃德的对话
在过去的一年里,博物馆、纪念碑和纪念馆被肯定和谴责美国基础的相互矛盾的叙述所挟持。抗议和示威活动要求对美国黑人,以及所有种族/少数民族群体进行种族清算,更广泛地说,是在现有的社会动荡海啸中增加的。几个月的机构封锁、人口流动受限以及全球COVID-19大流行导致的急剧经济衰退已经造成了损失。在撰写本文时,2020年总统选举的结果要么预示着当前局面的延续,要么预示着近期政府的不稳定有所缓解。在最初的怀疑之后,随着COVID-19的传播有增无减,全球各地的博物馆转向互联网,作为实体存在的替代方案。一些公司利用内部资源和创造力,以敏捷的方式进行转型;其他人则步履蹒跚,需要外界的帮助。大多数人创造了实物产品的数字模拟,其他人设想了新的互动形式,许多人急于记录和收集疫情的故事和物证。在本期中,从加州洛杉矶和华盛顿特区到瑞士贝尔和中国西安的文化机构和财团的回应提供了生动的例子。很少有机构偏离其公开的使命,收集或分发食物,帮助有紧急需求的社区成员,或提供迫切需要的实际和情感支持(DOERING 2020)。博物馆对种族清算呼吁的回应大多是雄辩的,但在支持“黑人的命也是命”(Black Lives Matter)方面却显得平淡无奇;然而,许多承诺在解决体制种族主义的建设性或创新方法、在管理或业务结构中实行重大改革、在非殖民化收藏计划或包括
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信