Performance analysis of mobile IP and SLM

R. Hsieh, A. Seneviratne
{"title":"Performance analysis of mobile IP and SLM","authors":"R. Hsieh, A. Seneviratne","doi":"10.1109/ICON.2001.962391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a performance analysis of two architectures for Internet host mobility management, namely, mobile IP and session layer mobility management (SLM). The mobile IP architecture is designed with the principle that the fixed Internet hosts should remain unmodified while only the underlying IP routing infrastructure should change. By contrast, SLM requires no changes to the existing IP infrastructure as well as the transport protocols but only modifications to the session layer protocols and the applications at the end hosts. We compare the performance advantages of the end-to-end mobility scheme with the network-layer mobility, scheme, and prove by experiments that the end-to-end scheme, i.e. SLM, is a better solution for host mobility in many situations.","PeriodicalId":178842,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. Ninth IEEE International Conference on Networks, ICON 2001.","volume":"2014 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. Ninth IEEE International Conference on Networks, ICON 2001.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICON.2001.962391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We present a performance analysis of two architectures for Internet host mobility management, namely, mobile IP and session layer mobility management (SLM). The mobile IP architecture is designed with the principle that the fixed Internet hosts should remain unmodified while only the underlying IP routing infrastructure should change. By contrast, SLM requires no changes to the existing IP infrastructure as well as the transport protocols but only modifications to the session layer protocols and the applications at the end hosts. We compare the performance advantages of the end-to-end mobility scheme with the network-layer mobility, scheme, and prove by experiments that the end-to-end scheme, i.e. SLM, is a better solution for host mobility in many situations.
移动IP和SLM的性能分析
我们提出了互联网主机移动性管理的两种架构,即移动IP和会话层移动性管理(SLM)的性能分析。移动IP架构的设计原则是,固定的互联网主机应该保持不变,而只有底层的IP路由基础设施应该改变。相比之下,SLM不需要修改现有的IP基础设施和传输协议,只需要修改会话层协议和终端主机上的应用程序。我们比较了端到端移动方案与网络层移动方案的性能优势,并通过实验证明了端到端方案(即SLM)在许多情况下是更好的主机移动解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信