Freedom in the Liberal Tradition

{"title":"Freedom in the Liberal Tradition","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197572214.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Michael Freeden approaches freedom as an essentially contestable concept—one that necessarily has a number of possible meanings. After covering this methodological assumption, the chapter discusses freedom’s development within the liberal tradition. An overview of Locke’s account of freedom is given, and it is argued that the ideological developments that had occurred by John Stuart Mill’s day were substantive enough to classify these two belief systems as distinct ideologies. From here the interview covers the competition between individualist, or libertarian, conceptions of freedom, and progressive liberal ones. It is argued that the latter played a key role in the development of welfare states, and the former in arguing against them. Freeden concludes with an argument against the possibility, or even desirability, of any permanent consensus in politics.","PeriodicalId":111427,"journal":{"name":"What is Freedom?","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"What is Freedom?","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197572214.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Michael Freeden approaches freedom as an essentially contestable concept—one that necessarily has a number of possible meanings. After covering this methodological assumption, the chapter discusses freedom’s development within the liberal tradition. An overview of Locke’s account of freedom is given, and it is argued that the ideological developments that had occurred by John Stuart Mill’s day were substantive enough to classify these two belief systems as distinct ideologies. From here the interview covers the competition between individualist, or libertarian, conceptions of freedom, and progressive liberal ones. It is argued that the latter played a key role in the development of welfare states, and the former in arguing against them. Freeden concludes with an argument against the possibility, or even desirability, of any permanent consensus in politics.
自由主义传统中的自由
迈克尔·弗里登将自由视为一个本质上可争议的概念——一个必然具有多种可能含义的概念。在讨论了这一方法论假设之后,本章讨论了自由在自由主义传统中的发展。本文概述了洛克对自由的描述,并认为约翰·斯图亚特·密尔时代的意识形态发展足以将这两种信仰体系划分为不同的意识形态。从这里开始,采访涵盖了个人主义或自由意志主义自由观念与进步自由主义自由观念之间的竞争。有人认为,后者在福利国家的发展中发挥了关键作用,而前者在反对福利国家的过程中发挥了关键作用。弗里登的结论是反对政治上任何永久共识的可能性,甚至是可取性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信