Towards an Understanding of Evidence-Based Practice.

Florence D. DiGennaro Reed, Derek D. Reed
{"title":"Towards an Understanding of Evidence-Based Practice.","authors":"Florence D. DiGennaro Reed, Derek D. Reed","doi":"10.1037/H0100416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The past two decades have seen a rise in the use of the term \"evidence-based practice'\" and a simultaneous increase in the variations in its definition and evaluation. Some of the variability may be attributed to differing, but related, conceptualizations of what constitutes an evidence-based practice across disciplines. Review of the literature reveals that a wide variety of professions and professional organizations are wrestling with this topic area. Such disciplines include, but are not limited to, medicine, clinical psychology, school psychology, counseling, behavior analysis, education, and nursing (Kazdin, 2006). Using our backgrounds as an example, it is clear that we--like many of the readers of Journal of Early Intensive Behavior Intervention--have training and experience that involves numerous disciplines. Specifically, we both received training in experimental psychology before entering a school psychology doctoral program where we were intertwined in both regular and special education. We were fortunate to receive additional training in a clinical psychology internship and have worked in early intervention settings, school-aged programs, and with adults receiving residential services. In addition, we are also Board Certified Behavior Analysts. Thus, for demonstration purposes, we focused our attention to our governing organizations for insight and clarification regarding evidence-based practices. The National Association of School Psychologists' (NASP) Professional Conduct Manual states that school psychologists are expected to engage in services which are \"delivered following the completion of a strategic planning process based on the needs of the consumers and an empirically supported program evaluation model\" (NASP, 2000, pg. 51). Moreover, federal regulations now mandate the use of \"scientifically based research\" in the selection and design of instructional strategies (Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004; No Child Left Behind Act of 2001). The American Psychological Association (APA) Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice--which evolved from an APA Division 12 (Clinical Psychology) Task Force--defines evidence-based practice in its position paper as \"the integration of the best available research with clinical expertise in the context of patient characteristics, culture, and preferences\" (APA, 2006, p. 273). Finally, as Board Certified Behavior Analysts, we operate under the Behavior Analyst Certification Board Guidelines for Responsible Conduct for Behavior Analysts which explicitly states that a behavior analyst \"has the responsibility to recommend scientifically supported most effective treatment procedures. Effective treatment procedures have been validated as having both long-term and short-term benefits to clients and society\" (BACB, 2004, Section 2.09a). Although these guidelines may imply a united front across disciplines with regards to an interest in utilizing treatments that \"work,\" implementation is a challenge since these terms are too vague to actually prescribe criteria to one's practice. Within the broader scope of psychology and education, various other groups are attempting to delineate evidence-based practices further. For instance, both Divisions 17 (Society of Counseling Psychology) and 29 (Psychotherapy) of APA have established task forces to arrive at standards of evidence-based practice (APA, 2006). The Society for Behavioral Medicine has also established similar criteria (Davidson, Trudeau, Ockene, Orleans, & Kaplan, 2003). In addition, the Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) called upon its Professional Standards & Practice Committee, as well as its Division for Research, to make proposals for evidence-based practice criteria (CEC, 2006). Finally, the Association for Behavior Analysis International recently launched the Evidence-Based Practices Special Interest Group (EBP SIG) aimed at translating behavioral research to practice in an effort to provide evidence-based practices to the general public. …","PeriodicalId":236920,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Early and Intensive Behavioral Intervention","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Early and Intensive Behavioral Intervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/H0100416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

The past two decades have seen a rise in the use of the term "evidence-based practice'" and a simultaneous increase in the variations in its definition and evaluation. Some of the variability may be attributed to differing, but related, conceptualizations of what constitutes an evidence-based practice across disciplines. Review of the literature reveals that a wide variety of professions and professional organizations are wrestling with this topic area. Such disciplines include, but are not limited to, medicine, clinical psychology, school psychology, counseling, behavior analysis, education, and nursing (Kazdin, 2006). Using our backgrounds as an example, it is clear that we--like many of the readers of Journal of Early Intensive Behavior Intervention--have training and experience that involves numerous disciplines. Specifically, we both received training in experimental psychology before entering a school psychology doctoral program where we were intertwined in both regular and special education. We were fortunate to receive additional training in a clinical psychology internship and have worked in early intervention settings, school-aged programs, and with adults receiving residential services. In addition, we are also Board Certified Behavior Analysts. Thus, for demonstration purposes, we focused our attention to our governing organizations for insight and clarification regarding evidence-based practices. The National Association of School Psychologists' (NASP) Professional Conduct Manual states that school psychologists are expected to engage in services which are "delivered following the completion of a strategic planning process based on the needs of the consumers and an empirically supported program evaluation model" (NASP, 2000, pg. 51). Moreover, federal regulations now mandate the use of "scientifically based research" in the selection and design of instructional strategies (Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004; No Child Left Behind Act of 2001). The American Psychological Association (APA) Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice--which evolved from an APA Division 12 (Clinical Psychology) Task Force--defines evidence-based practice in its position paper as "the integration of the best available research with clinical expertise in the context of patient characteristics, culture, and preferences" (APA, 2006, p. 273). Finally, as Board Certified Behavior Analysts, we operate under the Behavior Analyst Certification Board Guidelines for Responsible Conduct for Behavior Analysts which explicitly states that a behavior analyst "has the responsibility to recommend scientifically supported most effective treatment procedures. Effective treatment procedures have been validated as having both long-term and short-term benefits to clients and society" (BACB, 2004, Section 2.09a). Although these guidelines may imply a united front across disciplines with regards to an interest in utilizing treatments that "work," implementation is a challenge since these terms are too vague to actually prescribe criteria to one's practice. Within the broader scope of psychology and education, various other groups are attempting to delineate evidence-based practices further. For instance, both Divisions 17 (Society of Counseling Psychology) and 29 (Psychotherapy) of APA have established task forces to arrive at standards of evidence-based practice (APA, 2006). The Society for Behavioral Medicine has also established similar criteria (Davidson, Trudeau, Ockene, Orleans, & Kaplan, 2003). In addition, the Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) called upon its Professional Standards & Practice Committee, as well as its Division for Research, to make proposals for evidence-based practice criteria (CEC, 2006). Finally, the Association for Behavior Analysis International recently launched the Evidence-Based Practices Special Interest Group (EBP SIG) aimed at translating behavioral research to practice in an effort to provide evidence-based practices to the general public. …
对循证实践的理解。
过去二十年来,“循证实践”一词的使用有所增加,同时其定义和评价的变化也有所增加。一些可变性可能归因于不同的,但相关的,构成跨学科循证实践的概念。回顾文献表明,各种各样的专业和专业组织都在努力解决这个主题领域。这些学科包括但不限于医学、临床心理学、学校心理学、咨询、行为分析、教育和护理(Kazdin, 2006)。以我们的背景为例,很明显,我们——就像《早期强化行为干预杂志》的许多读者一样——受过涉及众多学科的培训和经验。具体来说,在进入学校心理学博士课程之前,我们都接受了实验心理学的培训,在那里我们同时接受了常规和特殊教育。我们很幸运地在临床心理学实习中接受了额外的培训,并在早期干预环境、学龄项目和接受住宿服务的成年人中工作过。此外,我们也是董事会认证的行为分析师。因此,出于演示的目的,我们将注意力集中在我们的管理组织上,以了解和澄清基于证据的实践。全国学校心理学家协会(NASP)的职业行为手册指出,学校心理学家应该从事“基于消费者需求和经验支持的项目评估模型完成战略规划过程后提供的服务”(NASP, 2000年,第51页)。此外,联邦法规现在要求在选择和设计教学策略时使用“基于科学的研究”(2004年《残疾人教育改善法》;《不让一个孩子掉队法案》)。美国心理学会(APA)基于证据的实践主席工作组——由美国心理学会第12分部(临床心理学)工作组演变而来——在其立场文件中将基于证据的实践定义为“在患者特征、文化和偏好的背景下,将最佳可用研究与临床专业知识相结合”(APA, 2006,第273页)。最后,作为委员会认证的行为分析师,我们在行为分析师认证委员会关于行为分析师负责任行为的指导方针下运作,该指导方针明确规定行为分析师“有责任推荐科学支持的最有效的治疗程序”。有效的治疗程序已被证实对客户和社会具有长期和短期的好处”(BACB, 2004, Section 2.09a)。尽管这些指导方针可能意味着在使用“有效”的治疗方法方面,跨学科的统一战线,但实施是一个挑战,因为这些术语太模糊,实际上不能为一个人的实践规定标准。在更广泛的心理学和教育学范围内,其他各种团体正试图进一步描述基于证据的实践。例如,美国心理学会第17分会(心理咨询学会)和第29分会(心理治疗)都成立了工作组,以达到循证实践的标准(美国心理学会,2006)。行为医学协会也建立了类似的标准(Davidson, Trudeau, Ockene, Orleans, & Kaplan, 2003)。此外,特殊儿童委员会(CEC)呼吁其专业标准与实践委员会及其研究部为基于证据的实践标准提出建议(CEC, 2006)。最后,国际行为分析协会最近成立了以证据为基础的实践特别兴趣小组(EBP SIG),旨在将行为研究转化为实践,努力向公众提供以证据为基础的实践。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信