The Legal Effects of a Serious Infringement of EU Law on Administrative Authorities and Courts: Comments on the Judgment of 10 March 2022, Case C-177/20 Grossmania, EU:C:2022:175

Xabier Arzoz
{"title":"The Legal Effects of a Serious Infringement of EU Law on Administrative Authorities and Courts: Comments on the Judgment of 10 March 2022, Case C-177/20 Grossmania, EU:C:2022:175","authors":"Xabier Arzoz","doi":"10.7590/187479822x16669633688000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The European Court of Justice's case-law has often dealt with conflicts between the principles of legality and legal certainty in national proceedings. In the Grossmania case, the Third Chamber of the Court ruled on the obligations of national administrative authorities and courts to\n nullify the unlawful consequences of a manifest and serious infringement of EU law. The preliminary ruling referred to the question of whether administrative authorities and courts should withdraw or disapply administrative decisions that are manifestly and seriously contrary to EU law but\n have become final in the absence of a challenge before the courts. The Court answered in the affirmative, save in specific cases in which objective and legitimate obstacles can preclude such measures. Nevertheless, in those cases affected persons should be granted the right to compensation,\n whether financial or other; besides, the State is liable for damage caused by the breach of EU law.","PeriodicalId":294114,"journal":{"name":"Review of European Administrative Law","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of European Administrative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7590/187479822x16669633688000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The European Court of Justice's case-law has often dealt with conflicts between the principles of legality and legal certainty in national proceedings. In the Grossmania case, the Third Chamber of the Court ruled on the obligations of national administrative authorities and courts to nullify the unlawful consequences of a manifest and serious infringement of EU law. The preliminary ruling referred to the question of whether administrative authorities and courts should withdraw or disapply administrative decisions that are manifestly and seriously contrary to EU law but have become final in the absence of a challenge before the courts. The Court answered in the affirmative, save in specific cases in which objective and legitimate obstacles can preclude such measures. Nevertheless, in those cases affected persons should be granted the right to compensation, whether financial or other; besides, the State is liable for damage caused by the breach of EU law.
严重违反欧盟法律行为对行政机关和法院的法律影响:评议2022年3月10日格罗斯曼尼亚案C-177/20的判决,EU:C:2022:175
欧洲法院的判例法经常处理国家诉讼中合法性原则和法律确定性原则之间的冲突。在Grossmania案中,法院第三分庭就国家行政当局和法院有义务消除明显和严重违反欧盟法律的非法后果作出裁决。初步裁决涉及的问题是,行政当局和法院是否应该撤回或撤销明显严重违反欧盟法律的行政决定,但在没有向法院提出质疑的情况下已成为最终决定。法院的回答是肯定的,但在客观和合法的障碍可以排除这种措施的具体情况下除外。然而,在这些情况下,应给予受影响的人获得赔偿的权利,无论是经济赔偿还是其他赔偿;此外,国家对违反欧盟法律所造成的损害负有责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信