Comparison of astigmatism after phacoemulsification and extracapsular cataract extraction

Hafiza Humaira Yasmeen, Iqra Khalil
{"title":"Comparison of astigmatism after phacoemulsification and extracapsular cataract extraction","authors":"Hafiza Humaira Yasmeen, Iqra Khalil","doi":"10.15406/aovs.2020.10.00386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare astigmatism after phacoemulsification and extracapsular cataract extraction technique. Method: It was a hospital-based cross-sectional study conducted at Zainab Medicare hospital Haroonabad from September 2018 to May 2019. A sample size of 80 patients having cataract, age 41 to 70 years was included in this study. Slit lamp examination was performed for anterior segment evaluation and astigmatism was determined with autorefraction and keratometry. Result: Phaco technique was more reliable. The means and the standard deviation of phaco post op astigmatism was 0.7860 ±.48880 and ECCE post op astigmatism was 3.6310±1.96236 which indicated that the degree of astigmatism increases after extra capsular cataract extraction technique. The significant level was 0.00 which showed that the phaco technique is highly significant. Conclusion: Corneal astigmatism was almost similar in two groups prior to surgery but after the cataract surgery the astigmatism significantly decreased after phacoemulsification group at 2 weeks follow-up, the results indicated that phaco may be considered superior to ECCE. No suturing is required in phaco and hence lesser chances of post op astigmatism.","PeriodicalId":287670,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Ophthalmology & Visual System","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Ophthalmology & Visual System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/aovs.2020.10.00386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare astigmatism after phacoemulsification and extracapsular cataract extraction technique. Method: It was a hospital-based cross-sectional study conducted at Zainab Medicare hospital Haroonabad from September 2018 to May 2019. A sample size of 80 patients having cataract, age 41 to 70 years was included in this study. Slit lamp examination was performed for anterior segment evaluation and astigmatism was determined with autorefraction and keratometry. Result: Phaco technique was more reliable. The means and the standard deviation of phaco post op astigmatism was 0.7860 ±.48880 and ECCE post op astigmatism was 3.6310±1.96236 which indicated that the degree of astigmatism increases after extra capsular cataract extraction technique. The significant level was 0.00 which showed that the phaco technique is highly significant. Conclusion: Corneal astigmatism was almost similar in two groups prior to surgery but after the cataract surgery the astigmatism significantly decreased after phacoemulsification group at 2 weeks follow-up, the results indicated that phaco may be considered superior to ECCE. No suturing is required in phaco and hence lesser chances of post op astigmatism.
超声乳化术与白内障囊外摘出术后散光的比较
目的:比较超声乳化术与白内障囊外摘出术后散光的差异。方法:于2018年9月至2019年5月在哈鲁纳巴德Zainab Medicare医院进行以医院为基础的横断面研究。本研究纳入了80例年龄在41至70岁之间的白内障患者。裂隙灯检查评估前节,自行屈光和角膜屈光度测定散光。结果:Phaco技术更可靠。白内障术后散光的均值和标准差为0.7860±。48880和ECCE术后散光为3.6310±1.96236,说明白内障囊外摘除术后散光程度增加。显著性水平为0.00,表明phaco技术具有高度显著性。结论:两组患者术前角膜散光基本相同,但术后随访2周,超声乳化术组患者角膜散光明显减少,结果提示超声乳化术优于ECCE。不需要缝合,因此术后散光的可能性较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信