The Effects of COVID-19 Information Sources and Knowledge, Attitude, and Behaviour on Vaccination Acceptance

R. Heriyanto, T. Yanto, G. Octavius, Haviza Nisa, Catherine Ienawi, H. E. Pasai
{"title":"The Effects of COVID-19 Information Sources and Knowledge, Attitude, and Behaviour on Vaccination Acceptance","authors":"R. Heriyanto, T. Yanto, G. Octavius, Haviza Nisa, Catherine Ienawi, H. E. Pasai","doi":"10.22146/jcoemph.78698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: This study intends to assess the impact of COVID-19 information-related sources, as well as one's knowledge, attitude, and behavior concerning vaccine acceptance, vaccine hesitancy, and vaccine refusal in a single vaccination site in Jambi, IndonesiaMethods: We conducted a cross-sectional study with total sampling in Puskesmas Putri Ayu, Jambi. The inclusion criteria are adults (>18 years) vaccinated with CoronaVac. Our exclusion criteria were refusal to participate in the study for any reason, contraindicated to COVID-19 vaccine administration, and receiving the second vaccine jab.Results: We include 245 respondents with a slight female predominance (53.5%). The majority is in the age group of 26-35 years old (20.8%). In the multivariate analysis, having a family member with≥2 comorbidities is almost six times more likely (OR 5.99, 95%CI 1.84-19.54; p-value = 0.003) to put a respondent in the vaccine hesitance and refusal group. Respondents who trust in friends or family are 2.25 times more likely (95%CI 1-5.04; p-value = 0.048) to belong in the vaccine hesitance and refusal group. Respondents who trust the internet are 0.45 times more likely to belong in the vaccine hesitance and refusal group (95%CI 0.21-0.96; p-value = 0.04). Lastly, respondents with poor knowledge are 0.58 times more likely (95%CI 0.38-0.88; p-value = 0.011) to belong in the vaccine hesitance and refusal group.Conclusions: This finding will be relevant to increasing vaccination uptake by targetting family members with comorbidities and devising a strategy to make their peers trust the COVID-19 vaccine to increase the uptake.","PeriodicalId":251344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Empowerment for Health","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Empowerment for Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/jcoemph.78698","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study intends to assess the impact of COVID-19 information-related sources, as well as one's knowledge, attitude, and behavior concerning vaccine acceptance, vaccine hesitancy, and vaccine refusal in a single vaccination site in Jambi, IndonesiaMethods: We conducted a cross-sectional study with total sampling in Puskesmas Putri Ayu, Jambi. The inclusion criteria are adults (>18 years) vaccinated with CoronaVac. Our exclusion criteria were refusal to participate in the study for any reason, contraindicated to COVID-19 vaccine administration, and receiving the second vaccine jab.Results: We include 245 respondents with a slight female predominance (53.5%). The majority is in the age group of 26-35 years old (20.8%). In the multivariate analysis, having a family member with≥2 comorbidities is almost six times more likely (OR 5.99, 95%CI 1.84-19.54; p-value = 0.003) to put a respondent in the vaccine hesitance and refusal group. Respondents who trust in friends or family are 2.25 times more likely (95%CI 1-5.04; p-value = 0.048) to belong in the vaccine hesitance and refusal group. Respondents who trust the internet are 0.45 times more likely to belong in the vaccine hesitance and refusal group (95%CI 0.21-0.96; p-value = 0.04). Lastly, respondents with poor knowledge are 0.58 times more likely (95%CI 0.38-0.88; p-value = 0.011) to belong in the vaccine hesitance and refusal group.Conclusions: This finding will be relevant to increasing vaccination uptake by targetting family members with comorbidities and devising a strategy to make their peers trust the COVID-19 vaccine to increase the uptake.
COVID-19信息来源及知识、态度和行为对疫苗接种接受的影响
本研究旨在评估印度尼西亚占碑市单一疫苗接种点COVID-19信息相关来源以及人们对疫苗接受、疫苗犹豫和拒绝疫苗的知识、态度和行为的影响。方法:我们在占碑市Puskesmas Putri Ayu进行了全抽样的横断面研究。纳入标准为接种过冠状病毒疫苗的成人(>18岁)。我们的排除标准为:因任何原因拒绝参加研究、对COVID-19疫苗接种有禁忌症、接受第二次疫苗注射。结果:我们纳入245名受访者,女性略占优势(53.5%)。其中以26-35岁年龄段居多(20.8%)。在多变量分析中,家庭成员有≥2种合并症的可能性几乎是6倍(OR 5.99, 95%CI 1.84-19.54;p值= 0.003)将应答者归入疫苗犹豫和拒绝组。相信朋友或家人的受访者的可能性高出2.25倍(95%CI 1-5.04;p值= 0.048)属于疫苗犹豫和拒绝组。信任互联网的受访者属于疫苗犹豫和拒绝组的可能性高出0.45倍(95%CI 0.21-0.96;p值= 0.04)。最后,知识贫乏的受访者是0.58倍的可能性(95%CI 0.38-0.88;p值= 0.011)属于疫苗犹豫和拒绝组。结论:这一发现将与通过针对有合并症的家庭成员增加疫苗接种率以及制定策略使其同龄人信任COVID-19疫苗以增加接种率有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信