{"title":"Voters of Populist Parties and Support for Reforms of Representative Democracy in Belgium","authors":"L. V. Dijk, Thomas Legein, J. Pilet, Sofie Marien","doi":"10.5553/plc/258999292020002003004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, studies have burgeoned on the link between populism and demands for democratic reforms. In particular, scholars have been debating the link between populist citizens or voters and support for referendums. In this article, we examine voters of populist parties (Vlaams Belang (VB) and Parti du Travail de Belgique-Partij van de Arbeid (PTB-PVDA)) in Belgium in 2019 and we look at their atti‐ tudes towards various types of democratic reforms. We find that voters of populist parties differ from the non-populist electorate in their support for different kinds of reforms of representative democracy. Voters of VB and PTB-PVDA have in com‐ mon stronger demands for limiting politicians’ prerogatives, for introducing binding referendums and for participatory budgeting. While Vlaams Belang voters are not significantly different from the non-populist electorate on advisory referen‐ dums, citizens’ forums or technocratic reform, PVDA-PTB voters seem more enthu‐ siastic. & The book chapter focuses on differences in the level of support for reforms of representative democracy across voters of Flemish and Francophone parties. This study extends the scope of the book chapter by examining to what extent the electoral bases of populist parties in Belgium are distinct in their attitudes towards reforms of representative democracy.","PeriodicalId":194633,"journal":{"name":"Politics of the Low Countries","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics of the Low Countries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5553/plc/258999292020002003004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Recently, studies have burgeoned on the link between populism and demands for democratic reforms. In particular, scholars have been debating the link between populist citizens or voters and support for referendums. In this article, we examine voters of populist parties (Vlaams Belang (VB) and Parti du Travail de Belgique-Partij van de Arbeid (PTB-PVDA)) in Belgium in 2019 and we look at their atti‐ tudes towards various types of democratic reforms. We find that voters of populist parties differ from the non-populist electorate in their support for different kinds of reforms of representative democracy. Voters of VB and PTB-PVDA have in com‐ mon stronger demands for limiting politicians’ prerogatives, for introducing binding referendums and for participatory budgeting. While Vlaams Belang voters are not significantly different from the non-populist electorate on advisory referen‐ dums, citizens’ forums or technocratic reform, PVDA-PTB voters seem more enthu‐ siastic. & The book chapter focuses on differences in the level of support for reforms of representative democracy across voters of Flemish and Francophone parties. This study extends the scope of the book chapter by examining to what extent the electoral bases of populist parties in Belgium are distinct in their attitudes towards reforms of representative democracy.
最近,关于民粹主义与民主改革要求之间联系的研究如雨后春笋般涌现。特别是,学者们一直在争论民粹主义公民或选民与公投支持之间的联系。在这篇文章中,我们研究了2019年比利时民粹主义政党(Vlaams Belang (VB)和partii du Travail de Belgique-Partij van de Arbeid (pdb - pvda))的选民,并研究了他们对各种类型的民主改革的态度。我们发现,民粹主义政党的选民与非民粹主义选民在支持不同类型的代议制民主改革方面存在差异。VB和PTB-PVDA的选民共同强烈要求限制政治家的特权,引入有约束力的公投和参与式预算。虽然弗拉明斯-贝朗的选民在咨询性公投、公民论坛或技术官僚改革方面与非民粹主义选民没有显著差异,但自由党-工人党选民似乎更热情。&该书章节着重于佛兰德语和法语政党选民对代议制民主改革的支持程度的差异。本研究通过考察比利时民粹主义政党的选举基础在多大程度上对代议制民主改革的态度不同,扩展了本书章节的范围。