Judicial Impartiality in Civil Proceedings: Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights and Selected Cases of the Supreme Court

T. Tsuvina
{"title":"Judicial Impartiality in Civil Proceedings: Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights and Selected Cases of the Supreme Court","authors":"T. Tsuvina","doi":"10.21564/2414-990x.160.273808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article addresses the issue of judicial impartiality in civil procedure, which is relevant from theoretical and practical perspectives. The purpose of the article is to highlight the main approaches to judicial impartiality as an integral part of the right to a fair trial in terms of the paragraph 1Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights, as well as to analyze the Supreme Court's practice for compliance with the approaches to the interpretation of judicial impartiality developed in the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. In the article the author uses general philosophical, general scientific and special research methods, in particular, dialectical, system-structural, logical and comparative legal methods, method of analysis and synthesis. The judicial impartiality is an integral element of the rule of law and the right to a fair trial. The European Convention on Human Rights and the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights played a key role in the development of international standards of judicial impartiality within the European region. The European Court of Human Rights developed a dual approach to judicial impartiality, distinguishing between subjective and objective impartiality. An additional approach to verifying the impartiality of the court in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights is to distinguish between functional and personal impartiality. The analysis of the Supreme Court practice shows that the latter has not fully accepted the approaches to judicial impartiality developed by the of the European Court of Human Rights. The article analyzes certain cases of the Supreme Court, in which, in the author's opinion, the Supreme Court incorrectly applied the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights in order to motivate its decisions. In addition, special attention is paid to the problem of the possibility of judicial disqualification on the grounds of the performance/non-performance of certain procedural powers by a judge. The article can be interesting for legal scholars and practitioners, PhD students and students of law universities.","PeriodicalId":417369,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Legality","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems of Legality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.160.273808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article addresses the issue of judicial impartiality in civil procedure, which is relevant from theoretical and practical perspectives. The purpose of the article is to highlight the main approaches to judicial impartiality as an integral part of the right to a fair trial in terms of the paragraph 1Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights, as well as to analyze the Supreme Court's practice for compliance with the approaches to the interpretation of judicial impartiality developed in the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. In the article the author uses general philosophical, general scientific and special research methods, in particular, dialectical, system-structural, logical and comparative legal methods, method of analysis and synthesis. The judicial impartiality is an integral element of the rule of law and the right to a fair trial. The European Convention on Human Rights and the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights played a key role in the development of international standards of judicial impartiality within the European region. The European Court of Human Rights developed a dual approach to judicial impartiality, distinguishing between subjective and objective impartiality. An additional approach to verifying the impartiality of the court in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights is to distinguish between functional and personal impartiality. The analysis of the Supreme Court practice shows that the latter has not fully accepted the approaches to judicial impartiality developed by the of the European Court of Human Rights. The article analyzes certain cases of the Supreme Court, in which, in the author's opinion, the Supreme Court incorrectly applied the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights in order to motivate its decisions. In addition, special attention is paid to the problem of the possibility of judicial disqualification on the grounds of the performance/non-performance of certain procedural powers by a judge. The article can be interesting for legal scholars and practitioners, PhD students and students of law universities.
民事诉讼中的司法公正:欧洲人权法院的判例法和最高法院的精选案例
本文从理论和实践两方面探讨了民事诉讼中的司法公正问题。本文的目的是强调司法公正作为《欧洲人权公约》第6条第1款规定的公平审判权的组成部分的主要途径,并分析最高法院遵循欧洲人权法院判例法中对司法公正的解释途径的做法。在本文中,作者运用了一般的哲学方法、一般的科学方法和特殊的研究方法,特别是辩证法、系统结构法、逻辑法和比较法,以及分析和综合的方法。司法公正是法治和公正审判权的重要组成部分。《欧洲人权公约》和欧洲人权法院的判例法在制定欧洲区域内司法公正的国际标准方面发挥了关键作用。欧洲人权法院制定了司法公正的双重方针,区分主观公正和客观公正。在欧洲人权法院的判例法中核查法院公正性的另一种办法是区分职务公正性和个人公正性。对最高法院实践的分析表明,最高法院并没有完全接受欧洲人权法院制定的司法公正的方法。本文分析了最高法院的某些案例,作者认为,在这些案例中,最高法院错误地适用了欧洲人权法院的判例法,以促使其作出决定。此外,还特别注意法官因行使/不行使某些程序性权力而丧失司法资格的可能性问题。这篇文章对于法律学者和从业者,博士生和法律大学的学生来说可能很有趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信