Comprehending Spreadsheets: Which Strategies do Users Apply?

K. Hodnigg, Christian Macho, M. Pinzger, D. Jannach
{"title":"Comprehending Spreadsheets: Which Strategies do Users Apply?","authors":"K. Hodnigg, Christian Macho, M. Pinzger, D. Jannach","doi":"10.1109/ICPC52881.2021.00044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spreadsheets are a ubiquitous means of communication and decision making, and adequate comprehension is required for reading, interpretation as well as maintenance. Despite being around for forty years, only selected aspects of comprehension were studied, mainly focusing on error detection and correction, and largely disregarding a more holistic view on spreadsheet comprehension processes.In this paper, we provide the first steps towards a deeper understanding of how users approach comprehension through a user study. In this study, we tasked eight spreadsheet users to describe their thought processes while trying to familiarize themselves with a real-world spreadsheet. The transcripts of these eight think-aloud studies were then used to identify 16 comprehension indicators validated by three experts. With these categories, we set out to qualitatively identify frequent comprehension patterns that the participants applied to understand spreadsheets.Although the comprehension process is highly individual, we could identify frequently occurring patterns, such as assumptions can imply consolidations and realizations, and realizations often happen before contradictions. The results of this work can be used to design better tools that assist users in comprehending spreadsheets.","PeriodicalId":288873,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE/ACM 29th International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC)","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE/ACM 29th International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPC52881.2021.00044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Spreadsheets are a ubiquitous means of communication and decision making, and adequate comprehension is required for reading, interpretation as well as maintenance. Despite being around for forty years, only selected aspects of comprehension were studied, mainly focusing on error detection and correction, and largely disregarding a more holistic view on spreadsheet comprehension processes.In this paper, we provide the first steps towards a deeper understanding of how users approach comprehension through a user study. In this study, we tasked eight spreadsheet users to describe their thought processes while trying to familiarize themselves with a real-world spreadsheet. The transcripts of these eight think-aloud studies were then used to identify 16 comprehension indicators validated by three experts. With these categories, we set out to qualitatively identify frequent comprehension patterns that the participants applied to understand spreadsheets.Although the comprehension process is highly individual, we could identify frequently occurring patterns, such as assumptions can imply consolidations and realizations, and realizations often happen before contradictions. The results of this work can be used to design better tools that assist users in comprehending spreadsheets.
理解电子表格:用户使用哪些策略?
电子表格是一种无处不在的沟通和决策手段,阅读、解释和维护都需要足够的理解能力。尽管已有40年左右的历史,但只对理解的某些方面进行了研究,主要集中在错误检测和纠正上,而在很大程度上忽视了对电子表格理解过程的更全面的看法。在本文中,我们为深入了解用户如何通过用户研究获得理解提供了第一步。在这项研究中,我们要求8位电子表格用户描述他们在尝试熟悉真实电子表格时的思维过程。这8项有声思考研究的文本随后被用来确定16个理解指标,并由三位专家验证。有了这些分类,我们开始定性地识别参与者用于理解电子表格的频繁理解模式。虽然理解过程是高度个性化的,但我们可以识别频繁出现的模式,例如假设可以暗示巩固和实现,而实现通常发生在矛盾之前。这项工作的结果可以用来设计更好的工具,帮助用户理解电子表格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书