Mathematics teacher competency analysis during online learning

Jitu Halomoan Lumbantoruan, Bernadetha Nadeak
{"title":"Mathematics teacher competency analysis during online learning","authors":"Jitu Halomoan Lumbantoruan, Bernadetha Nadeak","doi":"10.33122/ijtmer.v5i2.132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to find out where the difficulty of teacher competence is when implementing online mathematics materials. When online learning mathematics material, many students complain and get low learning outcomes. There are 92% of students have difficulty learning mathematics online. The basis of this problem needs to be analyzed where the difficulty of mathematics teacher competence in online learning. Data collection techniques with observations and shared instruments. The analysis is done by presenting the data, reducing it, and drawing conclusions. Results, 1) Online learning with the 2013 curriculum is still 95%. 2) There is no preparation and only the provision of package books. Student assessment of professional teacher competence 62% disagree and 45% pedagogically disagree, this disagreement is because the module was not prepared by the teacher himself. 3) 57, 14% disagree with the assessment method, the material being tested is more difficult than what is taught, and this is the cause of low learning outcomes. 4) Difficulty operating media, writing symbols, proving, explaining concepts, internet network, and correcting assignments. In conclusion, the difficulty lies in teachers with pedagogical competence with minimal learning aids and professional competence who cannot explain concepts in the media and are not assisted by self-made modules.","PeriodicalId":280543,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v5i2.132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to find out where the difficulty of teacher competence is when implementing online mathematics materials. When online learning mathematics material, many students complain and get low learning outcomes. There are 92% of students have difficulty learning mathematics online. The basis of this problem needs to be analyzed where the difficulty of mathematics teacher competence in online learning. Data collection techniques with observations and shared instruments. The analysis is done by presenting the data, reducing it, and drawing conclusions. Results, 1) Online learning with the 2013 curriculum is still 95%. 2) There is no preparation and only the provision of package books. Student assessment of professional teacher competence 62% disagree and 45% pedagogically disagree, this disagreement is because the module was not prepared by the teacher himself. 3) 57, 14% disagree with the assessment method, the material being tested is more difficult than what is taught, and this is the cause of low learning outcomes. 4) Difficulty operating media, writing symbols, proving, explaining concepts, internet network, and correcting assignments. In conclusion, the difficulty lies in teachers with pedagogical competence with minimal learning aids and professional competence who cannot explain concepts in the media and are not assisted by self-made modules.
在线学习中的数学教师胜任力分析
本研究旨在找出线上数学教材实施过程中,教师胜任力的难点在哪里。在网上学习数学材料时,许多学生抱怨,学习效果不佳。92%的学生在网上学习数学有困难。在此基础上需要分析数学教师在线学习能力的难点所在。数据收集技术与观测和共享仪器。分析是通过呈现数据、简化数据和得出结论来完成的。结果:1)2013年课程的在线学习率仍为95%。2)不准备,只提供包书。学生对专业教师能力的评估62%不同意,45%在教学上不同意,这种分歧是因为该模块不是由教师自己编写的。(3) 57.14%的学生不同意评估方法,所测试的材料比所教的更难,这是导致学习效果低的原因。4)难以操作媒体,书写符号,证明,解释概念,网络,批改作业。综上所述,困难在于教师的教学能力和学习辅助和专业能力都很弱,他们无法在媒体上解释概念,也没有自制模块的帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信