Towards Building the Indigenisation Theory: The Zimbabwean Resource Management Perspective

C. Mavhunga
{"title":"Towards Building the Indigenisation Theory: The Zimbabwean Resource Management Perspective","authors":"C. Mavhunga","doi":"10.13189/ujm.2018.060702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The dearth of studies to establish the line of fit for the indigenisation policy in Zimbabwe and the enactment of the Zimbabwe Democracy and Economic Recovery Act [S.494] [ZIDERA] 1 by the United States of America [USA] to challenge the government of Zimbabwe`s land reform and indigenisation policies motivated the production of this paper. Policy makers, members of the public, politicians, new farmers and other influential business pundits in Zimbabwe participated in the study. The study used non-experimental descriptive research design combining the deductive and inductive research approaches to be comprehensive. A desk review of secondary sources such as the indigenization Act [Chapter: 14:33] 2 , publications, policy guidelines and other relevant material was sought to establish the theoretical proposition. Questionnaires and interviews were the main research instruments. The study findings were that developing countries were getting impoverished whilst developed countries were getting enriched by the way poor states got integrated into the world system. The basis of this result is that poor countries depend on exports of primary products whilst rich nations export processed goods to poor countries at exorbitant prices, thereby deepening the poverty level. This violates the United Nations General Assembly resolution [1803.[xvii] 3 which entrenches the Principle of Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources.(PPSNR).To correct the imbalance, the study conclusion supports the need to indigenize the economy, but with a policy shift on the modalities in the configuration of the policy framework. The study also recommends the adoption of the Line of Fit theory in which indigenisation policy consideration focuses mainly on product beneficiation than continual exports of primary products. This indigenisation model need to embrace a 360 model which embraces mainly indigenized education systems, indigenized economic models, indigenized financial and management literacy and an indigenized corporate governance policy document for Zimbabweans and the removal of sanctions by the United States of America to give a chance to Zimbabweans to grow the economy to a 100 billion mark by 2030.","PeriodicalId":211193,"journal":{"name":"Universal journal of management","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Universal journal of management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13189/ujm.2018.060702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The dearth of studies to establish the line of fit for the indigenisation policy in Zimbabwe and the enactment of the Zimbabwe Democracy and Economic Recovery Act [S.494] [ZIDERA] 1 by the United States of America [USA] to challenge the government of Zimbabwe`s land reform and indigenisation policies motivated the production of this paper. Policy makers, members of the public, politicians, new farmers and other influential business pundits in Zimbabwe participated in the study. The study used non-experimental descriptive research design combining the deductive and inductive research approaches to be comprehensive. A desk review of secondary sources such as the indigenization Act [Chapter: 14:33] 2 , publications, policy guidelines and other relevant material was sought to establish the theoretical proposition. Questionnaires and interviews were the main research instruments. The study findings were that developing countries were getting impoverished whilst developed countries were getting enriched by the way poor states got integrated into the world system. The basis of this result is that poor countries depend on exports of primary products whilst rich nations export processed goods to poor countries at exorbitant prices, thereby deepening the poverty level. This violates the United Nations General Assembly resolution [1803.[xvii] 3 which entrenches the Principle of Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources.(PPSNR).To correct the imbalance, the study conclusion supports the need to indigenize the economy, but with a policy shift on the modalities in the configuration of the policy framework. The study also recommends the adoption of the Line of Fit theory in which indigenisation policy consideration focuses mainly on product beneficiation than continual exports of primary products. This indigenisation model need to embrace a 360 model which embraces mainly indigenized education systems, indigenized economic models, indigenized financial and management literacy and an indigenized corporate governance policy document for Zimbabweans and the removal of sanctions by the United States of America to give a chance to Zimbabweans to grow the economy to a 100 billion mark by 2030.
构建本土化理论:津巴布韦资源管理的视角
津巴布韦本土化政策与《津巴布韦民主与经济复苏法》的制定之间缺乏合适的研究。494] [ZIDERA] 1由美利坚合众国[USA]挑战津巴布韦政府的土地改革和本土化政策,促使本文的制作。津巴布韦的政策制定者、公众成员、政治家、新农民和其他有影响力的商业专家参与了这项研究。本研究采用非实验描述性研究设计,采用演绎与归纳相结合的研究方法,力求全面。为了确立这一理论命题,研究人员对《本土化法》[第14:33章]2、出版物、政策指导方针和其他相关材料等二手资料进行了案头审查。问卷调查和访谈是主要的研究手段。研究发现,发展中国家变得越来越贫穷,而发达国家却通过贫穷国家融入世界体系的方式变得越来越富裕。这一结果的基础是贫穷国家依赖初级产品的出口,而富裕国家则以过高的价格向贫穷国家出口加工产品,从而加深了贫困水平。这违反了联合国大会第1803号决议。[xvii]《自然资源永久主权原则》(PPSNR)。为了纠正这种不平衡,研究结论支持经济本土化的必要性,但在政策框架的配置方式上进行政策转变。该研究还建议采用契合线理论,在该理论中,本土化政策主要侧重于产品选矿,而不是初级产品的持续出口。这种本土化模式需要包含一个360度的模式,主要包括本土化的教育系统、本土化的经济模式、本土化的金融和管理素养、本土化的公司治理政策文件,以及美国取消制裁,让津巴布韦人有机会在2030年将经济增长到1000亿美元。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信