Investments in Societal Complexity, Diminishing Marginal Returns and Neoliberalism: A Note

N. Elhefnawy
{"title":"Investments in Societal Complexity, Diminishing Marginal Returns and Neoliberalism: A Note","authors":"N. Elhefnawy","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3739954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"Investments in Societal Complexity, Diminishing Marginal Returns and Neoliberalism: A Note\" discusses the switch from \"Keynesian Fordism\" to \"Neoliberal Financialization\" as the organizing model for economic policy from the 1970s on, and the consequences for the world economy as understood via the lens of Joseph Tainter's theory regarding societal investments on complexity passing a point of diminishing returns and decreasing societal slack. Specifically it argues that as the Fordist post-World War II economic model ran into diminishing returns, policymakers attempted to improve the trend via neoliberal as a way of pursuing efficiencies, and eventually the deeper reorganization that was Neoliberal Financialization--which process actually worsened the trend. Specifically, while it brought an extreme increase in the complexity of economic life (in the hypertrophy of finance, rising trans-national flows of investment and trade, and overall financial and economic integration globally), all the complexity went along with a continued decline in returns and eroding societal slack (with major states deindustrializing, economic growth rates declining, debt-to-GDP ratios rising, fiscal space shrinking, etc.), leaving it a failure in the end.","PeriodicalId":448175,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Political Economy: Comparative Capitalism eJournal","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Political Economy: Comparative Capitalism eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3739954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

"Investments in Societal Complexity, Diminishing Marginal Returns and Neoliberalism: A Note" discusses the switch from "Keynesian Fordism" to "Neoliberal Financialization" as the organizing model for economic policy from the 1970s on, and the consequences for the world economy as understood via the lens of Joseph Tainter's theory regarding societal investments on complexity passing a point of diminishing returns and decreasing societal slack. Specifically it argues that as the Fordist post-World War II economic model ran into diminishing returns, policymakers attempted to improve the trend via neoliberal as a way of pursuing efficiencies, and eventually the deeper reorganization that was Neoliberal Financialization--which process actually worsened the trend. Specifically, while it brought an extreme increase in the complexity of economic life (in the hypertrophy of finance, rising trans-national flows of investment and trade, and overall financial and economic integration globally), all the complexity went along with a continued decline in returns and eroding societal slack (with major states deindustrializing, economic growth rates declining, debt-to-GDP ratios rising, fiscal space shrinking, etc.), leaving it a failure in the end.
社会复杂性投资、边际收益递减和新自由主义:注
《社会复杂性投资、边际收益递减和新自由主义:注释》讨论了从“凯恩斯主义福特主义”到“新自由主义金融化”作为20世纪70年代以来经济政策的组织模式的转变,以及通过约瑟夫·泰恩特(Joseph Tainter)关于社会复杂性投资通过收益递减和社会松弛减少点的理论来理解的对世界经济的影响。具体来说,它认为,当福特主义的二战后经济模式陷入收益递减时,政策制定者试图通过新自由主义来改善这一趋势,作为一种追求效率的方式,并最终进行更深层次的重组,即新自由主义金融化——这一过程实际上恶化了这一趋势。具体来说,虽然它带来了经济生活复杂性的极端增加(金融的肥大化,跨国投资和贸易流动的增加,以及全球金融和经济的整体一体化),但所有这些复杂性都伴随着回报的持续下降和社会松弛的侵蚀(主要国家去工业化,经济增长率下降,债务与gdp之比上升,财政空间缩小等),最终使其失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信