Class action for prevention and mitigation of soots in Rivers State of Nigeria: lessons from other jurisdictions

Samuel Dike, Prince Godwin Gininwa
{"title":"Class action for prevention and mitigation of soots in Rivers State of Nigeria: lessons from other jurisdictions","authors":"Samuel Dike, Prince Godwin Gininwa","doi":"10.32438//wpe.1719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The residents of Port Harcourt and its environs recently experienced black substance, known as carbon or soot with dull brown particles produced by incomplete combustion of crude oil and other waste materials within the environs. Many residents, including the government are really concerned about the impacts of this substance on public health, and the ecosystem. This concern is germane because of the trans- boundary nature of carbon emissions, and coupled with the serious negative health impacts on the residents. For now, it is not quite feasible to quantify the magnitude of impacts because some impacts are temporary while others are irreversible. Being a novel occurrence in this part of the world, some traditional legal and regulatory frameworks did not anticipate this occurrence and are thus inadequate in addressing the problem. Similarly, private actions by aggrieved citizens had proven inadequate in redressing grave air pollution cases in Nigeria; hence the need for class action. The Rivers State Governments and other Nongovernmental Organizations (NGOs) in the state seemed overwhelmed with this development since the soot was first noticed in 2016 but not much have been done by the relevant agencies of government, to stem this menace. We argue that past efforts by these agencies have largely been episodic thereby occasioning serious havoc to human health and the ecosystem around Port Harcourt. The objective of this paper is to appraise the causes of soot in Port Harcourt, determine appropriate preventive measures and makes appropriate recommendations, drawing lessons from other jurisdictions.","PeriodicalId":177785,"journal":{"name":"WEENTECH Proceedings in Energy","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WEENTECH Proceedings in Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32438//wpe.1719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The residents of Port Harcourt and its environs recently experienced black substance, known as carbon or soot with dull brown particles produced by incomplete combustion of crude oil and other waste materials within the environs. Many residents, including the government are really concerned about the impacts of this substance on public health, and the ecosystem. This concern is germane because of the trans- boundary nature of carbon emissions, and coupled with the serious negative health impacts on the residents. For now, it is not quite feasible to quantify the magnitude of impacts because some impacts are temporary while others are irreversible. Being a novel occurrence in this part of the world, some traditional legal and regulatory frameworks did not anticipate this occurrence and are thus inadequate in addressing the problem. Similarly, private actions by aggrieved citizens had proven inadequate in redressing grave air pollution cases in Nigeria; hence the need for class action. The Rivers State Governments and other Nongovernmental Organizations (NGOs) in the state seemed overwhelmed with this development since the soot was first noticed in 2016 but not much have been done by the relevant agencies of government, to stem this menace. We argue that past efforts by these agencies have largely been episodic thereby occasioning serious havoc to human health and the ecosystem around Port Harcourt. The objective of this paper is to appraise the causes of soot in Port Harcourt, determine appropriate preventive measures and makes appropriate recommendations, drawing lessons from other jurisdictions.
尼日利亚河流州预防和减轻煤烟的集体诉讼:来自其他司法管辖区的经验教训
哈科特港及其周边地区的居民最近经历了一种黑色物质,这种物质被称为碳或煤烟,其中含有暗棕色颗粒,是由周围地区的原油和其他废物不完全燃烧产生的。许多居民,包括政府都非常担心这种物质对公众健康和生态系统的影响。由于碳排放的跨国界性质,加上对居民健康的严重负面影响,这种关注是密切相关的。目前,对影响的程度进行量化还不太可行,因为有些影响是暂时的,而另一些影响是不可逆转的。作为世界这一地区的一种新现象,一些传统的法律和监管框架没有预料到这种情况的发生,因此不足以解决这一问题。同样,在尼日利亚,受害公民的私人行动证明不足以解决严重的空气污染案件;因此需要集体诉讼。自2016年首次发现煤烟以来,河流州政府和该州的其他非政府组织(ngo)似乎对这一发展感到不知所措,但政府相关机构并没有采取太多措施来遏制这一威胁。我们认为,这些机构过去的努力在很大程度上是断断续续的,因此对人类健康和哈科特港周围的生态系统造成了严重破坏。本文的目的是评估哈科特港煤烟的原因,确定适当的预防措施,并提出适当的建议,借鉴其他司法管辖区的经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信