Evaluation of Sustainable P4MCL/PLLA Block Copolymers as PVC Replacement in Medical Plastics

Tyler J Gathman, J. Schoephoerster, R. Vasdev, Stephanie Liffland, Derek C. Batiste
{"title":"Evaluation of Sustainable P4MCL/PLLA Block Copolymers as PVC Replacement in Medical Plastics","authors":"Tyler J Gathman, J. Schoephoerster, R. Vasdev, Stephanie Liffland, Derek C. Batiste","doi":"10.1115/dmd2022-1051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Aliphatic polyesters are potential sustainable alternatives to PVC for use in medical devices, such as IV bags. Our candidate replacement of PVC-based IV bags use P4MCL, a sustainable polymer with demonstrated uses in mechanically robust materials. The goal of our project was to compare the mechanical and biocompatibility characteristics of P4MCL/PLLA star block copolymer TPEs with commercial PVC-based IV bags. P4MCL/PLLA TPEs were synthesized according to previously reported methods. Uniaxial tensile testing was conducted pre- and post-autoclave. Impact and tear resistance testing was performed on non-autoclaved specimens according to ASTM standards. Cytotoxicity was examined using NIH 3T3 Fibroblasts with an AlamarBlue assay. A student’s t-test was used to compare results with statistical significance of P < 0.05. PVC tended to be stiffer but P4MCL/PLLA was more extensible. The tensile properties for the P4MCL-based material did not change after autoclaving. When compared to PVC-based IV bags, the P4MCL/PLLA TPE demonstrated a lower peak force and average force but a greater elongation at break and total absorbed energy (P<0.05). P4MCL/PLLA, unlike PVC-based materials with DEHP plasticizer, was non-cytotoxic. In summary, P4MCL/PLLA has desirable mechanical and biocompatibility advantages compared to PVC making the material a potential sustainable alternative for medical grade plastics.","PeriodicalId":236105,"journal":{"name":"2022 Design of Medical Devices Conference","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 Design of Medical Devices Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/dmd2022-1051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aliphatic polyesters are potential sustainable alternatives to PVC for use in medical devices, such as IV bags. Our candidate replacement of PVC-based IV bags use P4MCL, a sustainable polymer with demonstrated uses in mechanically robust materials. The goal of our project was to compare the mechanical and biocompatibility characteristics of P4MCL/PLLA star block copolymer TPEs with commercial PVC-based IV bags. P4MCL/PLLA TPEs were synthesized according to previously reported methods. Uniaxial tensile testing was conducted pre- and post-autoclave. Impact and tear resistance testing was performed on non-autoclaved specimens according to ASTM standards. Cytotoxicity was examined using NIH 3T3 Fibroblasts with an AlamarBlue assay. A student’s t-test was used to compare results with statistical significance of P < 0.05. PVC tended to be stiffer but P4MCL/PLLA was more extensible. The tensile properties for the P4MCL-based material did not change after autoclaving. When compared to PVC-based IV bags, the P4MCL/PLLA TPE demonstrated a lower peak force and average force but a greater elongation at break and total absorbed energy (P<0.05). P4MCL/PLLA, unlike PVC-based materials with DEHP plasticizer, was non-cytotoxic. In summary, P4MCL/PLLA has desirable mechanical and biocompatibility advantages compared to PVC making the material a potential sustainable alternative for medical grade plastics.
P4MCL/PLLA嵌段共聚物在医用塑料中替代PVC的研究
脂肪族聚酯是PVC的潜在可持续替代品,可用于医疗设备,如静脉输液袋。我们的候选pvc基IV袋替代品使用P4MCL,一种可持续聚合物,在机械坚固的材料中得到了证明。我们项目的目标是比较P4MCL/PLLA星形嵌段共聚物TPEs与商用pvc基IV袋的机械和生物相容性特性。P4MCL/PLLA TPEs根据先前报道的方法合成。在高压灭菌前后分别进行了单轴拉伸试验。根据ASTM标准对非蒸压试样进行抗冲击和抗撕裂试验。使用NIH 3T3成纤维细胞用AlamarBlue检测细胞毒性。比较结果采用学生t检验,P < 0.05有统计学意义。PVC趋于刚性,而P4MCL/PLLA具有更强的可扩展性。高压灭菌后,p4mcl基材料的拉伸性能没有变化。与pvc基IV袋相比,P4MCL/PLLA TPE表现出更低的峰值力和平均力,但断裂伸长率和总吸收能量更高(P<0.05)。与使用DEHP增塑剂的pvc基材料不同,P4MCL/PLLA没有细胞毒性。总之,与PVC相比,P4MCL/PLLA具有理想的机械和生物相容性优势,使该材料成为医疗级塑料的潜在可持续替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信