Leaky-wave antennas using artificial dielectrics at millimiter wave frequencies

I. Bahl, P. Bhartia
{"title":"Leaky-wave antennas using artificial dielectrics at millimiter wave frequencies","authors":"I. Bahl, P. Bhartia","doi":"10.1109/APS.1980.1148234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The feasibility of freguency scanning and dielectric scanning {changing the direction of the bearn by varying the relative permittivity of the electrically controlled liquid artificial dielectric medium) of a leaky-wave antenna using rodded artificial dielectric is investigated theoretically. From Table l it is noted that for small scan ranges, the frequency scanned antenna (FSA) has less variation in the bearnwidth as compared to the dielectric-scanned antenna (DSA) . The gain of a dielectric-scanned antenna is greater by about 0.8 dB over the frequency-scanned antenna. Efficiency is more or less the same for bath the types in the case of small scan ranges as well as for large scan ranges. For large scan range (lO°-55°) the maximum and minimum gains of DSA are 21.0 dB and 19.2 dB respectively cornpared to 20.2 dB and 17.0 dB for the FSA. It is thus noted that the FSA has more variation in the gain of the antenna in comparison to the DSA. Variation in the beamwidth is almost the same for bath techniques, although the DSA has about 15% less beamwidth than the FSA. Thus it may be concluded that for large scan ranges, a dielectric-scanned antenna has better scanning characteristics than a frequency-scanned antenna. It is also found that the present structure (AD) is rouch more dispersive than the insular guide studied for frequency scanned arrays, silicon waveguide with metallic stripe perturbations used for frequency scanned antenna and inverted strip dielectric waveguide, when the same dielectric material is used.","PeriodicalId":310469,"journal":{"name":"1980 Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1980-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1980 Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APS.1980.1148234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

The feasibility of freguency scanning and dielectric scanning {changing the direction of the bearn by varying the relative permittivity of the electrically controlled liquid artificial dielectric medium) of a leaky-wave antenna using rodded artificial dielectric is investigated theoretically. From Table l it is noted that for small scan ranges, the frequency scanned antenna (FSA) has less variation in the bearnwidth as compared to the dielectric-scanned antenna (DSA) . The gain of a dielectric-scanned antenna is greater by about 0.8 dB over the frequency-scanned antenna. Efficiency is more or less the same for bath the types in the case of small scan ranges as well as for large scan ranges. For large scan range (lO°-55°) the maximum and minimum gains of DSA are 21.0 dB and 19.2 dB respectively cornpared to 20.2 dB and 17.0 dB for the FSA. It is thus noted that the FSA has more variation in the gain of the antenna in comparison to the DSA. Variation in the beamwidth is almost the same for bath techniques, although the DSA has about 15% less beamwidth than the FSA. Thus it may be concluded that for large scan ranges, a dielectric-scanned antenna has better scanning characteristics than a frequency-scanned antenna. It is also found that the present structure (AD) is rouch more dispersive than the insular guide studied for frequency scanned arrays, silicon waveguide with metallic stripe perturbations used for frequency scanned antenna and inverted strip dielectric waveguide, when the same dielectric material is used.
在毫米波频率下使用人造介质的漏波天线
从理论上探讨了带杆人工介质漏波天线的频率扫描和介电扫描(通过改变电控液体人工介电介质的相对介电常数来改变天线方向)的可行性。从表1中可以注意到,对于小扫描范围,频率扫描天线(FSA)与电介质扫描天线(DSA)相比,天线宽度的变化较小。电介质扫描天线的增益比频率扫描天线高约0.8 dB。在小扫描范围和大扫描范围的情况下,效率或多或少是相同的。对于大扫描范围(lO°-55°),DSA的最大和最小增益分别为21.0 dB和19.2 dB,而FSA的最大和最小增益分别为20.2 dB和17.0 dB。因此,值得注意的是,与DSA相比,FSA在天线增益方面有更多的变化。尽管DSA的波束宽度比FSA小15%,但波束宽度的变化与镀液技术几乎相同。因此可以得出结论,对于大扫描范围,电介质扫描天线比频率扫描天线具有更好的扫描特性。在相同介质材料的情况下,本文结构的色散比用于扫描阵列的岛波导、用于扫描天线的金属条纹微扰硅波导和反向条形介质波导的色散大得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信