Democratic Participation in Early Childhood Education and Care - Serving the Best Interests of the Child

E. Eriksen
{"title":"Democratic Participation in Early Childhood Education and Care - Serving the Best Interests of the Child","authors":"E. Eriksen","doi":"10.7577/NBF.2319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: The meaning of democratic participation in Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) remainsvague and difficult to implement. Thus, the aim of this paper is to contribute to this gap of knowledge by shed light on the meaning of democratic participation in relation to the best interests of the child, by analysing General Comment No. 14 (2013). The research uses theories on democracy in ECEC to discuss the results (Biesta, 2014, 2015; Moss, 2007, 2011; Pettersvold, 2014; Einarsdottir, Purola, Johansson, Broström, &Emilson, 2015). The study investigates how key terms (rights, participation, unity/collective, equality, influence and responsibility) relate to democratic participation. Findings indicate that these terms are used to align with ideas about the “best interests of the child”. Furthermore, the study identified specific groups of children who can be in vulnerable situations and their explicit right to express their views and to influence decisions affecting them in ECEC institutions. I therefore argue that understanding democracy in ECEC must focus on inclusion of children who can be in vulnerable situations because this is in the best interests of the child. \nKeywords: Best Interests of the Child, Democratic Participation, Document Analysis, General Comments","PeriodicalId":276582,"journal":{"name":"Tidsskrift for Nordisk barnehageforskning","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tidsskrift for Nordisk barnehageforskning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7577/NBF.2319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Abstract: The meaning of democratic participation in Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) remainsvague and difficult to implement. Thus, the aim of this paper is to contribute to this gap of knowledge by shed light on the meaning of democratic participation in relation to the best interests of the child, by analysing General Comment No. 14 (2013). The research uses theories on democracy in ECEC to discuss the results (Biesta, 2014, 2015; Moss, 2007, 2011; Pettersvold, 2014; Einarsdottir, Purola, Johansson, Broström, &Emilson, 2015). The study investigates how key terms (rights, participation, unity/collective, equality, influence and responsibility) relate to democratic participation. Findings indicate that these terms are used to align with ideas about the “best interests of the child”. Furthermore, the study identified specific groups of children who can be in vulnerable situations and their explicit right to express their views and to influence decisions affecting them in ECEC institutions. I therefore argue that understanding democracy in ECEC must focus on inclusion of children who can be in vulnerable situations because this is in the best interests of the child. Keywords: Best Interests of the Child, Democratic Participation, Document Analysis, General Comments
幼儿教育和保育的民主参与-为儿童的最大利益服务
摘要:在幼儿教育与保育(ECEC)中,民主参与的意义仍然模糊且难以实施。因此,本文的目的是通过分析第14号一般性意见(2013年),阐明与儿童最大利益相关的民主参与的意义,从而弥补这一知识差距。该研究使用ECEC中的民主理论来讨论结果(Biesta, 2014, 2015;Moss, 2007, 2011;Pettersvold, 2014;Einarsdottir, Purola, Johansson, Broström, &Emilson, 2015)。该研究调查了关键术语(权利、参与、团结/集体、平等、影响和责任)与民主参与的关系。调查结果表明,这些术语被用来与关于“儿童最大利益”的想法保持一致。此外,研究还确定了可能处于弱势处境的特定儿童群体,以及他们在欧共体机构中表达意见和影响影响他们的决定的明确权利。因此,我认为,理解ECEC的民主必须把重点放在包容可能处于弱势地位的儿童上,因为这符合儿童的最大利益。关键词:儿童最大利益;民主参与;文件分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信