Chapter 2: Set of Exercises Designed to Develop Interhemispheric Interactions

S.V. Kurdiukova, O. Merkulova
{"title":"Chapter 2: Set of Exercises Designed to Develop Interhemispheric Interactions","authors":"S.V. Kurdiukova, O. Merkulova","doi":"10.1080/10610405.2020.1717845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of interhemispheric asymmetry and interhemispheric interaction is one of the most relevant problems of neuropsychology. The first data on the lateralization of brain function date back to the time of Hippocrates, when the connections between unilateral head injuries and contralateral convulsions were observed and described. By the beginning of the nineteenth century an ample amount of facts had been amassed concerning the nonequivalence of the left and right hemispheres of the brain. E.D. Khomskaia [2005], discussing the historical aspect of the study of the functional asymmetry of the brain, maintains that the theory of functional asymmetry went through several stages in its development. The first, classical concept of functional asymmetry was based on the postulate that the functions of the right and left hemispheres were absolutely opposite to each other. It was believed that the left hemisphere was completely dominant for speech and all mental processes, while the right one was given a subordinate role in organizing mental activity. Moreover (according to J. H. Jackson), the dominance itself was understood as the leading role of the left hemisphere. By the mid-nineteenth century, the interest of researchers had shifted from the study of the left hemisphere of the brain to the right one. The theory of functional asymmetry, reinforced by new data, was named “the concept of relative dominance” [ibid.]. It was still based on the idea of the opposition of functions of the left and right hemispheres and affirmed the notion of the relative dominance of the left hemisphere in regard to speech function and to speech-mediated mental processes (among righthanders) and the relative dominance of the right hemisphere in organizing nonverbal gnostic functions. This approach was typified by the idea","PeriodicalId":308330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Russian & East European Psychology","volume":"213 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Russian & East European Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10610405.2020.1717845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The problem of interhemispheric asymmetry and interhemispheric interaction is one of the most relevant problems of neuropsychology. The first data on the lateralization of brain function date back to the time of Hippocrates, when the connections between unilateral head injuries and contralateral convulsions were observed and described. By the beginning of the nineteenth century an ample amount of facts had been amassed concerning the nonequivalence of the left and right hemispheres of the brain. E.D. Khomskaia [2005], discussing the historical aspect of the study of the functional asymmetry of the brain, maintains that the theory of functional asymmetry went through several stages in its development. The first, classical concept of functional asymmetry was based on the postulate that the functions of the right and left hemispheres were absolutely opposite to each other. It was believed that the left hemisphere was completely dominant for speech and all mental processes, while the right one was given a subordinate role in organizing mental activity. Moreover (according to J. H. Jackson), the dominance itself was understood as the leading role of the left hemisphere. By the mid-nineteenth century, the interest of researchers had shifted from the study of the left hemisphere of the brain to the right one. The theory of functional asymmetry, reinforced by new data, was named “the concept of relative dominance” [ibid.]. It was still based on the idea of the opposition of functions of the left and right hemispheres and affirmed the notion of the relative dominance of the left hemisphere in regard to speech function and to speech-mediated mental processes (among righthanders) and the relative dominance of the right hemisphere in organizing nonverbal gnostic functions. This approach was typified by the idea
第二章:一套旨在发展大脑半球间互动的练习
脑间不对称和脑间相互作用问题是神经心理学中最相关的问题之一。关于脑功能侧化的第一个数据可以追溯到希波克拉底时代,当时观察并描述了单侧头部损伤和对侧抽搐之间的联系。到19世纪初,人们已经积累了大量关于大脑左右半球不相等的事实。E.D. Khomskaia[2005]讨论了大脑功能不对称研究的历史方面,认为功能不对称理论在其发展过程中经历了几个阶段。第一个经典的功能不对称概念是基于右半球和左半球的功能完全相反的假设。人们认为,左半球完全主导语言和所有心理过程,而右半球在组织心理活动方面起从属作用。此外(根据j·h·杰克逊的说法),支配本身被理解为左半球的主导作用。到19世纪中期,研究人员的兴趣已经从研究大脑的左半球转移到右半球。功能不对称理论在新数据的支持下被命名为“相对优势概念”[同上]。它仍然是基于左右脑功能对立的观点,并且肯定了左脑在语言功能和语言介导的心理过程(在右撇子中)方面的相对优势,以及右脑在组织非语言功能方面的相对优势。这种方法的典型代表是这个想法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信