"As Pretty a Piece of Price Fixing as I Ever Saw": Prerelease Engagements and the Circumvention of the Paramount Consent Decrees

Deron Overpeck
{"title":"\"As Pretty a Piece of Price Fixing as I Ever Saw\": Prerelease Engagements and the Circumvention of the Paramount Consent Decrees","authors":"Deron Overpeck","doi":"10.2979/filmhistory.34.1.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Despite hopes for a more equitable cinematic marketplace after the 1948 Paramount decision, the studios quickly developed new methods of dominating exhibition. One technique, the prerelease engagement, created an unofficial first run at higher prices before a film's official release. The Department of Justice's disinterested response to exhibitor complaints demonstrated that it was no longer interested in policing the industry. Using the trade press and congressional testimony, this essay traces the history of the prerelease and exhibitors' unsuccessful attempts to block it—an early example of the decline of the Paramount decrees as a means to counter studio dominance.","PeriodicalId":426632,"journal":{"name":"Film History: An International Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Film History: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/filmhistory.34.1.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT:Despite hopes for a more equitable cinematic marketplace after the 1948 Paramount decision, the studios quickly developed new methods of dominating exhibition. One technique, the prerelease engagement, created an unofficial first run at higher prices before a film's official release. The Department of Justice's disinterested response to exhibitor complaints demonstrated that it was no longer interested in policing the industry. Using the trade press and congressional testimony, this essay traces the history of the prerelease and exhibitors' unsuccessful attempts to block it—an early example of the decline of the Paramount decrees as a means to counter studio dominance.
“我所见过的最漂亮的价格操纵”:发行前约定和对最高同意法令的规避
摘要:尽管在1948年派拉蒙公司的决定之后,人们希望电影市场更加公平,但制片厂很快就开发出了新的方法来主导电影放映。其中一种方法是“预映参与”,即在电影正式上映前以较高的价格进行非官方的首次放映。司法部对参展商投诉的冷漠回应表明,它不再有兴趣监管这个行业。利用行业媒体和国会证词,本文追溯了预发行的历史,以及放映商试图阻止它的失败尝试——这是派拉蒙法令作为对抗电影公司主导地位的一种手段而衰落的早期例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信