The end of Liberalism?

A. Carlson, Rafael Hurtado Domínguez
{"title":"The end of Liberalism?","authors":"A. Carlson, Rafael Hurtado Domínguez","doi":"10.21555/cya.iiii.2.2592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article argues that the liberal family system, as crafted by late 17th Century British political theorist John Locke and enjoying apparent success as late as the 1960s, is now in ruins. Three internal contradictions which brought the system down can be identified: the first was a faulty understanding of human nature, which denigrated males and placed too great of the real family burden on women; the second contradiction was the liberal family’s lack of functions, which led to its material and economic disintegration; the third was its reliance on coercive social engineering, which undermined the very religious values which allowed the known system to work. “Self-actualization” and “gender theory,” Carlson and Hurtado show, are the logical consummation of liberalism, and fatal to its natural family order. They also reveal how and why the liberal ideal of tolerance has failed in recent decades.","PeriodicalId":163360,"journal":{"name":"Conocimiento y Acción","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conocimiento y Acción","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21555/cya.iiii.2.2592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article argues that the liberal family system, as crafted by late 17th Century British political theorist John Locke and enjoying apparent success as late as the 1960s, is now in ruins. Three internal contradictions which brought the system down can be identified: the first was a faulty understanding of human nature, which denigrated males and placed too great of the real family burden on women; the second contradiction was the liberal family’s lack of functions, which led to its material and economic disintegration; the third was its reliance on coercive social engineering, which undermined the very religious values which allowed the known system to work. “Self-actualization” and “gender theory,” Carlson and Hurtado show, are the logical consummation of liberalism, and fatal to its natural family order. They also reveal how and why the liberal ideal of tolerance has failed in recent decades.
自由主义的终结?
这篇文章认为,由17世纪晚期英国政治理论家约翰·洛克(John Locke)精心打造的自由家庭制度,直到20世纪60年代还在表面上取得成功,但如今已是一片废墟。导致男权制度崩溃的内在矛盾有三:一是对人性的错误认识,贬低了男性,把过多的真正家庭负担放在了女性身上;第二个矛盾是自由主义家庭功能的缺失,导致了其物质和经济的解体;第三是它对强制性社会工程的依赖,这破坏了使已知制度得以运作的宗教价值观。卡尔森和乌尔塔多指出,“自我实现”和“性别理论”是自由主义的逻辑完善,对其自然的家庭秩序是致命的。它们还揭示了近几十年来自由主义的宽容理想是如何以及为什么失败的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信