The Shared Tradition of the Septuagint and the Samaritan Pentateuch

E. Tov
{"title":"The Shared Tradition of the Septuagint and the Samaritan Pentateuch","authors":"E. Tov","doi":"10.1163/9789004406056_021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From the earliest days of the critical study of the SP it was known that this text often agrees with the LXX against MT, a situation that the early theological discussions comparing the value of the MT and LXX often exploited. Traditionally the Catholic scholars upheld the value of the LXX against MT, finding support in the frequent agreement of the LXX with the SP. They also considered the ancient Hebrew script of the SP more trustworthy than the square script of MT. These issues were discussed in the seventeenth century not long after the SP had become known in the West. The Catholic scholar Jean Morin (Johannes Morinus) initiated the discussion on the value of SP when he opined that the combined evidence of the SP and LXX weighed heavier than that of MT alone. He also based himself much on the ancient origin of the Samaritan script compared with that of MT. A few years later he published another philological work that discredited the MT.","PeriodicalId":216997,"journal":{"name":"Textual Developments","volume":"143 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Textual Developments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004406056_021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

From the earliest days of the critical study of the SP it was known that this text often agrees with the LXX against MT, a situation that the early theological discussions comparing the value of the MT and LXX often exploited. Traditionally the Catholic scholars upheld the value of the LXX against MT, finding support in the frequent agreement of the LXX with the SP. They also considered the ancient Hebrew script of the SP more trustworthy than the square script of MT. These issues were discussed in the seventeenth century not long after the SP had become known in the West. The Catholic scholar Jean Morin (Johannes Morinus) initiated the discussion on the value of SP when he opined that the combined evidence of the SP and LXX weighed heavier than that of MT alone. He also based himself much on the ancient origin of the Samaritan script compared with that of MT. A few years later he published another philological work that discredited the MT.
《七十士译本》和《撒玛利亚五经》的共同传统
从早期对SP的批判研究开始,人们就知道这篇文章经常同意LXX反对MT,这是早期比较MT和LXX价值的神学讨论经常利用的情况。传统上,天主教学者支持LXX的价值,反对MT,在LXX与SP的频繁一致中找到支持。他们还认为SP的古希伯来文比MT的方文更值得信赖。这些问题在17世纪被讨论后不久,SP在西方为人所知。天主教学者Jean Morin (Johannes Morinus)率先对SP的价值进行了讨论,他认为SP和LXX的联合证据比单独的MT更重要。他也在很大程度上以撒玛利亚文字的古代起源为基础,而不是MT。几年后,他出版了另一部语言学作品,质疑MT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信