Forward versus Spot Price Modeling

Jan-Frederik Mai
{"title":"Forward versus Spot Price Modeling","authors":"Jan-Frederik Mai","doi":"10.1142/9789813272569_0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is possible to base an equity derivatives pricing model on a stochastic driving process for the share price (spot), or for the equity forward. While the former is the classical approach pioneered by Black and Scholes [9], the latter approach separates the modeling of exogenous random price fluctuations from the cost-of-carry modeling of the stock, probably the first and most prominent example of this technique being the paper by Black [8]. While the Black—Scholes spot price approach and Black’s forward approach are equivalent, the present note demonstrates that the introduction of local volatility and/ or level-dependent default intensity into the stochastic driving process destroys this equivalence, if applied carelessly. The advantages and disadvantages of both approaches are discussed.","PeriodicalId":128926,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in Insurance, Risk- and Asset Management","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in Insurance, Risk- and Asset Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813272569_0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is possible to base an equity derivatives pricing model on a stochastic driving process for the share price (spot), or for the equity forward. While the former is the classical approach pioneered by Black and Scholes [9], the latter approach separates the modeling of exogenous random price fluctuations from the cost-of-carry modeling of the stock, probably the first and most prominent example of this technique being the paper by Black [8]. While the Black—Scholes spot price approach and Black’s forward approach are equivalent, the present note demonstrates that the introduction of local volatility and/ or level-dependent default intensity into the stochastic driving process destroys this equivalence, if applied carelessly. The advantages and disadvantages of both approaches are discussed.
远期与现货价格模型
可以将股票衍生品定价模型建立在股票价格(现货)或股票期货的随机驱动过程上。前者是Black和Scholes[9]开创的经典方法,后者将外生随机价格波动的建模与股票的持有成本建模分离开来,这种技术的第一个也是最突出的例子可能是Black[8]的论文。虽然布莱克-斯科尔斯现货价格方法和布莱克的远期价格方法是等效的,但本报告表明,如果不小心将局部波动和/或水平相关的默认强度引入随机驱动过程,则会破坏这种等效性。讨论了这两种方法的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信