Development and Validation of Composite Ergonomic Analysis Module Applicable to Fabric Embellishment Workers

D. Esther, A. Mrunalini
{"title":"Development and Validation of Composite Ergonomic Analysis Module Applicable to Fabric Embellishment Workers","authors":"D. Esther, A. Mrunalini","doi":"10.1080/09737189.2014.11885415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract India is a country known for its culture and traditions all over the world. Handicrafts sector plays a significant and important role in the country’s economy. Among several embroidery works aari is traditional hand embroidery carried out on a wooden cot like frame with aar needle. embellishment workers for long hours sitting on without any seating aids, and are prone to developing musculoskeletal symptoms. A survey was carried out to identify the need to develop the ergonomic analysis module. The literature search on ergonomic evaluation tools, revealed the availability of about 12 qualitative, 9 quantitative tools and 10 ergonomic analysis modules mostly in the form of software packages. Among them, Ergomaster module was selected as a frame of reference as it covered all the aspects of analyzing any work environment. A total of seven tools including four ergonomic checkpoints formats, five rating scales on degree of difficulty were developed using the Likert scale method of summated ratings. The constructed analysis module was analyzed by thirty experts of various research and technical experts for its content validation in terms of four qualities and was found consistent. The tool was also tested for reliability with p value above 0. 9 confirming the tool for its dependability in eliciting the needed data from the subjects.","PeriodicalId":415880,"journal":{"name":"Studies on Home and Community Science","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies on Home and Community Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09737189.2014.11885415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract India is a country known for its culture and traditions all over the world. Handicrafts sector plays a significant and important role in the country’s economy. Among several embroidery works aari is traditional hand embroidery carried out on a wooden cot like frame with aar needle. embellishment workers for long hours sitting on without any seating aids, and are prone to developing musculoskeletal symptoms. A survey was carried out to identify the need to develop the ergonomic analysis module. The literature search on ergonomic evaluation tools, revealed the availability of about 12 qualitative, 9 quantitative tools and 10 ergonomic analysis modules mostly in the form of software packages. Among them, Ergomaster module was selected as a frame of reference as it covered all the aspects of analyzing any work environment. A total of seven tools including four ergonomic checkpoints formats, five rating scales on degree of difficulty were developed using the Likert scale method of summated ratings. The constructed analysis module was analyzed by thirty experts of various research and technical experts for its content validation in terms of four qualities and was found consistent. The tool was also tested for reliability with p value above 0. 9 confirming the tool for its dependability in eliciting the needed data from the subjects.
适用于织物润饰工人的复合材料人体工程学分析模块的开发与验证
印度是一个以其文化和传统闻名于世的国家。手工业在国家经济中占有重要地位。在几种刺绣作品中,aari是一种传统的手工刺绣,用针在木床状的框架上进行。装饰工人长时间坐在没有任何座位辅助,并容易产生肌肉骨骼症状。进行了一项调查,以确定开发人体工程学分析模块的必要性。通过对人机工程学评价工具的文献检索,发现有12个定性工具、9个定量工具和10个人机工程学分析模块,大多以软件包的形式存在。其中,Ergomaster模块被选为参考框架,因为它涵盖了分析任何工作环境的所有方面。采用李克特评分法开发了包括四种人体工程学检查点格式、五种难度评定量表在内的七种工具。构建的分析模块由30位不同研究领域的专家和技术专家从四个方面对其内容进行验证,结果一致。该工具也进行了可靠性测试,p值大于0。确认该工具在从被试中获取所需数据方面的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信