Machiavellian PPP? - Evidence from Italian Local Government's Projects for Public Services

Federico Antellini russo, Roberto Zampino
{"title":"Machiavellian PPP? - Evidence from Italian Local Government's Projects for Public Services","authors":"Federico Antellini russo, Roberto Zampino","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1992460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) have been widely advocated as flexible contractual solutions enabling the public sector to profit from private firms’ innovative solutions for providing public services. More recently, however, practitioners and academics alike have cast doubts on a possible instrumental use of PPPs. When most of the upfront investment rests on the private partner, the public counterpart may be tempted by reaping the benefit in the short-term while shifting to farther years the financial burden.If the budget accounts, especially at the Municipality level, is tight enough, such a 'Machiavelian' use of PPPs may become the privileged way to realize infrastructural facilities without any consideration of the efficiency of the provision. We test this 'public finance bias' hypothesis by using data from local projects by Italian Municipalities.","PeriodicalId":368113,"journal":{"name":"State & Local Government eJournal","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"State & Local Government eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1992460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) have been widely advocated as flexible contractual solutions enabling the public sector to profit from private firms’ innovative solutions for providing public services. More recently, however, practitioners and academics alike have cast doubts on a possible instrumental use of PPPs. When most of the upfront investment rests on the private partner, the public counterpart may be tempted by reaping the benefit in the short-term while shifting to farther years the financial burden.If the budget accounts, especially at the Municipality level, is tight enough, such a 'Machiavelian' use of PPPs may become the privileged way to realize infrastructural facilities without any consideration of the efficiency of the provision. We test this 'public finance bias' hypothesis by using data from local projects by Italian Municipalities.
狡猾的购买力平价?-来自意大利地方政府公共服务项目的证据
作为灵活的合同解决方案,公私伙伴关系(ppp)已被广泛提倡,使公共部门能够从私营公司提供公共服务的创新解决方案中获利。然而,最近,从业人员和学者都对ppp可能的有效使用表示怀疑。当大部分前期投资由私人合作伙伴承担时,公共合作伙伴可能会受到短期收益的诱惑,同时将财政负担转移到未来几年。如果预算账户,特别是在市政一级,足够紧张,这种“马基雅维利式”的ppp使用可能成为实现基础设施的特权方式,而不考虑提供的效率。我们通过使用意大利市政当局的地方项目数据来检验这一“公共财政偏见”假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信