European transmission tariff harmonization: A modeling analysis

C. Konstantinidis, G. Strbac, D. Pudjianto, S. Gammons, R. Druce, R. Moreno
{"title":"European transmission tariff harmonization: A modeling analysis","authors":"C. Konstantinidis, G. Strbac, D. Pudjianto, S. Gammons, R. Druce, R. Moreno","doi":"10.1109/EEM.2012.6254804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Single Electricity Market (SEM) target model envisages zonal market price coupling across Europe by 2014 as well as harmonization of transmission tariffs of the coupled countries. To date the majority of EU countries have uniform transmission charges with the exceptions of a few countries, which have geographically varying tariffs. This paper presents a robust modeling methodology for evaluating transmission charging arrangements and analyses two options for transmission pricing, namely uniform and locational transmission charges, by evaluating the economic efficiency of each tariff and how it affects integration of low-carbon energy sources. Our modeling framework combines investment and operational wholesale power market models with models of transmission investment and charging. We have used our methodology to compare the development of the Great Britain electricity system to 2030 under the two different charging regimes. Our analysis demonstrates that moving from the current locational to a uniform transmission charge would incentivize generation to locate in more remote parts of Great Britain. This in turn would drive significantly higher transmission investment costs and losses leading to reduced social welfare. At the same time, we find no significant difference in performance between the two charging regimes in terms of CO2 emissions and the achievement of the UK target for 30% of renewables in electricity consumption by 2020.","PeriodicalId":383754,"journal":{"name":"2012 9th International Conference on the European Energy Market","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 9th International Conference on the European Energy Market","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2012.6254804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The Single Electricity Market (SEM) target model envisages zonal market price coupling across Europe by 2014 as well as harmonization of transmission tariffs of the coupled countries. To date the majority of EU countries have uniform transmission charges with the exceptions of a few countries, which have geographically varying tariffs. This paper presents a robust modeling methodology for evaluating transmission charging arrangements and analyses two options for transmission pricing, namely uniform and locational transmission charges, by evaluating the economic efficiency of each tariff and how it affects integration of low-carbon energy sources. Our modeling framework combines investment and operational wholesale power market models with models of transmission investment and charging. We have used our methodology to compare the development of the Great Britain electricity system to 2030 under the two different charging regimes. Our analysis demonstrates that moving from the current locational to a uniform transmission charge would incentivize generation to locate in more remote parts of Great Britain. This in turn would drive significantly higher transmission investment costs and losses leading to reduced social welfare. At the same time, we find no significant difference in performance between the two charging regimes in terms of CO2 emissions and the achievement of the UK target for 30% of renewables in electricity consumption by 2020.
欧洲输电电价协调:一个模型分析
单一电力市场(SEM)目标模型设想到2014年整个欧洲的区域市场价格耦合以及耦合国家的输电关税协调。迄今为止,大多数欧盟国家都有统一的传输费用,但少数国家例外,这些国家的关税在地理上有所不同。本文提出了一种评估输电收费安排的稳健建模方法,并通过评估每种电价的经济效率及其对低碳能源整合的影响,分析了输电定价的两种选择,即统一输电收费和就地输电收费。我们的建模框架将投资和运营批发电力市场模型与输电投资和充电模型相结合。我们用我们的方法比较了两种不同收费制度下英国电力系统到2030年的发展情况。我们的分析表明,从目前的位置转移到统一的输电收费将激励发电设在英国更偏远的地区。这反过来又会大大提高输电投资成本和损失,导致社会福利减少。与此同时,我们发现在二氧化碳排放和实现英国到2020年可再生能源占电力消耗30%的目标方面,两种充电制度的表现没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信